The concealment of the algorithm makes the subject-object relationship of the original clear confrontation confusing,making the judgment of the subject's responsible uncertain.Unveiling the algorithm,revealing the hidden subject,and discipline the object of trespassing is the key to algorithm governance.In ordinary social activities,algorithmic trespassing threatens people's subjectivity,which will not only break the pattern of the subject system,but also lead to the weakening of people's subjective initiative,so that the resulting risks escape in the assumption of responsibility.In the practice of public pow-er,algorithms often induce users to make biased decisions.From the perspective of the division of jurisdiction in the depart-ment of law,the role of algorithms in decision-making is distributed in the civil and commercial,administrative and criminal fields,among which the risk of algorithm trespassing in the civil and commercial field is high in consumption and business deci-sions,the algorithm trespass in the administrative field is related to the value selection of public service algorithm decision-making typically,and the algorithm trespass in the criminal justice field usually involves the issue of basic rights of citizens.The attribution governance of algorithmic trespassing can be centered on the governance subject,governance object and govern-ance process.According to the different departmental laws for evaluating the trespassing behavior,the structured algorithmic encroachment governance determines the type of encroachment,matches the attribute that algorithm shows,and gives the gen-eral principles of homing governance.
Algorithm RegulationSubjectivityAlgorithmic GovernanceTrespassing of AlgorithmAlgorithmic Homing
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
