首页|论算法的私法调整进路

论算法的私法调整进路

扫码查看
算法的私法调整进路主要涵盖场景化和领域化两种典型主张.基于应用环境考量的场景化进路立足当前,基于规范系统考量的领域化进路面向长远,二者均致力于回应算法技术突破所带来的挑战.算法表现为人机交互的决策机制,其实质是人类选择特定算法并将其作为决策规则嵌入意思表示当中,从而完成对私人事务的安排.算法私法调整的规范原理在于,算法内部呈现独具特色的商谈结构,对外则发挥双重界面功能,这决定了算法能够在不同程度上影响民事主体主观意志的内容.与之相应,私法对算法的调整应当建立在对算法进行类型化构建的基础之上,进而实现算法规范群落的体系化展开.根据算法对意思表示作用机制和影响程度的不同,可以将算法分为传达型算法、诱导型算法、修正型算法和驱动型算法.算法的私法调整进路可以在类型化的基础上,以《民法典》为核心,整合形成针对算法行为的解释规范和效力规范群落.
There are two typical paths of private law regulation of algorithms,which are the sce-nario-based path and the domain-oriented path.The scenario-based path is based on considerations of applicable environment and focuses on the present.The domain-oriented path is based on consid-erations of norm systems and focuses on the future.Both are committed to responding to the challen-ges posed by technological breakthroughs of algorithm.The algorithm is a decision-making mecha-nism of human-computer interaction,and humans choose an algorithm as a decision rule embedded in the expression of intent,thus completing the arrangement of personal affairs.The normative princi-ple of the private law regulation of algorithms is that the algorithm functions as a unique communica-tion structure inside,and plays a dual interface function outside,which determines that the algorithm can affect the content of the subjective will of the civil subject to different degrees.Accordingly,the regulation of algorithms in private law should also be based on the classification of algorithms,then completing the systematic construction of algorithm norms community.According to the different mechanisms by which algorithms affect the expression of intent,algorithms can be divided into com-municative algorithms,inductive algorithms,corrective algorithms,and driving algorithms.The pri-vate law regulation path of algorithms can also be based on the classification,with Civil Code as the core,to integrate the norms community of interpretation and validity of algorithms.

AlgorithmAlgorithm ActsInterpretation on Algorithm ActsValidity of Algo-rithm ActsPrivate Law

田峰

展开 >

浙江师范大学法学院

算法 算法行为 算法行为解释 算法行为效力 私法

2024

法制与社会发展
吉林大学

法制与社会发展

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.707
ISSN:1006-6128
年,卷(期):2024.30(5)