首页|NLR、PCT、IL-6、CRP、SAA联合检测对不同病原菌血流感染的诊断价值

NLR、PCT、IL-6、CRP、SAA联合检测对不同病原菌血流感染的诊断价值

扫码查看
目的 探究中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、降钙素原(PCT)、白介素-6(IL-6)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)联合检测对不同病原菌血流感染(BSI)的诊断价值.方法 选取2021年5月至2023年5月于东莞市清溪医院就诊的200例血流感染患者作为研究对象,根据病原菌检测结果将患者分为革兰阳性菌组、革兰阴性菌组与真菌组,对各组患者NLR、PCT、IL-6、CRP以及SAA水平进行检测,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各指标单独及联合检测对于不同病原菌血流感染的诊断价值.结果 200例阳性患者中革兰阳性菌92例,革兰阴性菌101例,真菌7例;三组PCT、IL-6、CRP、SAA水平比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析结果显示:SAA的曲线下面积值(AUC)值最高,分别为0.997、0.927、0.991,联合后与单一SAA诊断的AUC比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 PCT、IL-6、CRP、SAA水平在不同病原菌BSI患者中存在差异,均可作为不同病原菌BSI的诊断鉴别指标,其中以SAA的诊断鉴别效能相对最佳.
Diagnostic value of joint detection of NLR,PCT,IL-6,CRP and SAA in bloodstream infections caused by different pathogenic bacteria
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of joint detection of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),procalcitonin(PCT),interleukin-6(IL-6),C-reactive protein(CRP)and serum amyloid A(SAA)in bloodstream infections(BSI)caused by different pathogenic bacteria. Methods A total of 200 patients with BSI who were treated at Dongguan Qingxi Hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were select-ed as the study subjects. The patients were divide patients into three groups based on the results of pathogen detection:Gram positive,Gram negative,and fungal groups. The levels of NLR,PCT,IL-6,CRP and SAA were measured in each group. The diagnostic value of each indicator and the combination of these indicators in BSI caused by different pathogenic bacteria was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Among the 200 patients,92 were infected with Gram-positive bacteria,101 were infected with Gram-negative bacteria and 7 were infected with fungi. There were statistically significant differences in the levels of PCT,IL-6,CRP and SAA(P<0.05). The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)values of SAA were the largest(0.997,0.927 and 0.991). There was no statistically significant difference in AUC compared to single diagnosis with SAA (P>0.05). Conclusion The levels of PCT,IL-6,CRP and SAA vary in patients with BSI caused by different pathogenic bacteria. These levels can be utilized to differentiate between BSI caued by different pathogenic bacteria. Among these markers ,SAA demonstrates the highest diagnostic efficacy.

Bloodstream infectionPathogenic bacteriaNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioProcalcitoninInterleukin-6C-reactive protein

李艳红、李珍宇、梁世炫、殷爱顺、阳颖

展开 >

东莞市清溪医院检验科,广东,东莞523600

血流感染 病原菌 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 降钙素原 白介素-6 C-反应蛋白

东莞市社会发展科技项目

20221800904152

2024

分子诊断与治疗杂志
中山大学

分子诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.65
ISSN:1674-6929
年,卷(期):2024.16(2)
  • 16