首页|胃功能三项及NLR、CEA联合检测对胃溃疡良恶性的诊断价值分析

胃功能三项及NLR、CEA联合检测对胃溃疡良恶性的诊断价值分析

扫码查看
目的 分析研究胃功能三项[胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ(PGⅠ)、胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ(PGⅡ)、胃蛋白酶原比值(PGR)]及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、癌胚抗原(CEA)联合检测对胃溃疡良恶性的诊断价值.方法 选取2020年1月至2022年11月淮南朝阳医院收治的胃溃疡患者为研究对象,将其命名为胃溃疡组(n=100),另选同期在本院体检的健康人群为对照组(n=60).比较两组外周血PGⅠ、PGⅡ、PGR、NLR及CEA水平;根据内镜与病理检查结果,将胃溃疡组患者分为良性组(n=76)与恶性组(n=24).采用多因素logistics回归分析胃溃疡恶性病变的影响因素;绘制ROC曲线分析外周血PGⅠ、PGⅡ、PGR、NLR、CEA对胃溃疡恶性病变的预测价值.结果 胃溃疡组的PGⅠ、PGR水平均低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(t=22.044、35.045,P<0.05);胃溃疡组的PGⅡ、NLR、CEA水平均高于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(t=17.810、9.481、29.557,P<0.05);多因素logistics回归分析显示,Hp感染阳性(OR=1.865)、过量饮酒(OR=2.046)、PGⅠ降低(OR=2.006)、PGⅡ升高(OR=2.028)、PGR降低(OR=2.098)、NLR升高(OR=1.958)以及CEA水平升高(OR=2.071)均是胃溃疡恶性病变的独立危险因素(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析显示,PGⅠ、PGⅡ、PGR、NLR、CEA及联合检测预测胃溃疡良恶性病变的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.822、0.815、0.863、0.786、0.828、0.951,联合检测优于单一检测(P<0.05).结论 PGⅠ、PGⅡ、PGR及NLR、CEA联合检测对胃溃疡良恶性病变具有一定的诊断价值.
Analysis of the diagnostic value of three gastric function tests,and combined testing of NLR and CEA for benign and malignant gastric ulcers
Objective To analyze the diagnostic value of three gastric function tests[pepsinogenⅠ(PGⅠ),pepsinogenⅡ(PGⅡ),pepsinogen ratio(PGR),neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and carcino-embryonic antigen(CEA)in benign and malignant gastric ulcers. Methods Patients with gastric ulcers admit-ted to Huainan Chaoyang Hospital from January 2020 to November 2022 were selected as the study subjects and referred to as the gastric ulcer group(n=100). Healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations at our hospital during the same period were chosen as the control group(n=60). The levels of PGⅠ,PGⅡPGR, NLR and CEA in the peripheral blood were compared between the two groups. Based on the results of endosco-py and pathological examinations,patients with gastric ulcers were divided into a benign group(n=76)and a malignant group (n=24). The influencing factors of malignant lesions in gastric ulcers were analyzed using multi-factor logistics regression. An ROC curve was drawn to assess the predictive value of peripheral blood PGⅠ, PGⅡ,PGR,NLR and CEA for malignant lesions in gastric ulcers. Results The levels of PG I and PGR in the gastric ulcer group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically signifi-cant(t=22.044,35.045,P<0.05). The levels of PGⅡ,NLR and CEA in the gastric ulcer group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(t=17.810,9.481,29.557,P<0.05). Multi-factor logistics regression analysis shows that positive Hp infection(OR=1.865),excessive alcohol consumption(OR=2.046),decreased PG I(OR=2.006),increased PGⅡ(OR=2.028),decreased PGR(OR=2.098),increased NLR(OR=1.958),and increased CEA level(OR=2.071)were independent risk factors for malignant lesions of gastric ulcers (P<0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC)of PG I,PGⅡ,PGR,NLR,CEA,and combined detection in predicting benign and malignant lesions in gastric ulcers were 0.822,0.815,0.863,0.786,0.828,0.951,respectively. The combined detection was bet-ter than single detection(P<0.05). Conclusion The combined detection of PGⅠ,PGⅡ,PGR,NLR and CEA has a certain diagnostic value for distinguishing between benign and malignant gastric ulcers.

Gastric ulcerBenign and malignantThree tests of gastric functionNeutrophil/lymphocyte ratioCarcinoembryonic antigen

张磊、吴军、李宏伟、程磊、陈筠

展开 >

安徽省淮南市朝阳医院老年医学科,安徽,淮南232000

安徽省淮南市朝阳医院消化内科,安徽,淮南232000

胃溃疡 良恶性 胃功能三项 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 癌胚抗原

安徽省重点研发计划

1804h08020267

2024

分子诊断与治疗杂志
中山大学

分子诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.65
ISSN:1674-6929
年,卷(期):2024.16(3)
  • 14