首页|MLPR、NLR、RDW对老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞的评估价值

MLPR、NLR、RDW对老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞的评估价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨单核细胞/大血小板比值(MLPR)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、红细胞分布宽度(RDW)对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)患者合并慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重的评估价值.方法 选取2020年1月至2022年12月邯郸市第一医院收治的118例老年AECOPD合并肺栓塞患者作为观察组,并根据FEV1占预计值的百分比(FEV1%pred)水平分为轻度、中度、重度、极重度,选取同期80例老年AECOPD未合并肺栓塞患者为对照组.对比两组一般临床资料,探讨影响老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞的危险因素;评估MLPR、NLR、RDW水平对老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞的诊断效能及与疾病严重程度的相关性.结果 观察组病程、MLPR、NLR、RDW、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)、D-二聚体均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=7.409、17.995、10.733、8.724、13.983、7.829、10.596,P<0.05);Logistic分析显示,病程、MLPR、NLR、RDW、PLR、FIB、D-二聚体均为老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞的独立危险因素(P<0.05);MLPR、NLR、RDW三者单独及联合检测诊断AUC分别为 0.866、0.835、0.795、0.937,联合检测优于单一检测(P<0.05);老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞MLPR、NLR、RDW水平为极重度>重度>中度>轻度,差异有统计学意义(F=126.998、37.074、34.927,P<0.05);Spearman分析显示,MLPR、NLR、RDW与疾病严重程度呈正相关(r=0.865、0.775、0.661,P<0.05).结论 老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞时MLPR、NLR、RDW水平升高并与疾病严重程度呈正相关,三者联合检测对老年AECOPD患者合并肺栓塞具有良好的诊断效能.
Evaluation value of MLPR,NLR and RDW in elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with pulmonary embolism
Objective To investigate the value of monocyte/large platelet ratio(MLPR),neutro-phil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and red blood cell distribution width(RDW)in the assessment of acute exacerba-tion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly patients with AECOPD.Methods A total of 118 elder-ly patients with AECOPD complicated by pulmonary embolism were admitted to the First Hospital of Handan City from January 2020 to December 2022 and were selected as the observation group.They were divided into categories of mild,moderate,severe and extremely severe based on the percentage of FEV1 in the predicted val-ue(FEV1%pred).Additionally,80 elderly patients with AECOPD without pulmonary embolism were selected as the control group.The general clinical data of the two groups were compared to explore the risk factors for el-derly patients with AECOPD complicated by pulmonary embolism.The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of MLPR,NLR and RDW levels in elderly AECOPD patients with pulmonary embolism and their cor-relation with disease severity.Results The duration of the disease,along with MLPR,NLR,RDW,PLR,FIB and D-dimer levels in the observation group were higher compared to those in the control group.These dif-ferences were statistically significant(t=7.409,17.995,10.733,8.724,13.983,7.829,10.596,P<0.05).Lo-gistic analysis showed that disease duration,MLPR,NLR,RDW,PLR,FIB and D-dimer were independent risk factors for elderly AECOPD complicated with pulmonary embolism(P<0.05).The AUC values for ML-PR,NLR and RDW were 0.866,0.835,0.795 and 0.937,respectively,with the AUC values being higher than those of single detection(P<0.05).The levels of MLPR,NLR and RDW in elderly patients with pulmonary em-bolism were categorized as extremely severe,severe,moderate,mild,with statistically significant differences(F=126.998,37.074,34.927,P<0.05).Spearman analysis showed that MLPR,NLR,and RDW were posi-tively correlated with disease severity(r=0.865,0.775,0.661,P<0.05).Conclusion The levels of MLPR,NLR and RDW increased and were positively correlated with the severity of the disease in elderly AECOPD pa-tients with pulmonary embolism.The combined detection of MLPR,NLR and RDW showed good diagnostic ef-ficacy in elderly AECOPD patients with pulmonary embolism.

AECOPDPulmonary embolismMLPRNLRRDW

邢芳远、郭小霞、郭瑞霞

展开 >

河北省邯郸市第一医院呼吸与危重症医学二科,河北,邯郸 056000

AECOPD 肺栓塞 MLPR NLR RDW

邯郸市科学技术研究与发展计划

21422083064

2024

分子诊断与治疗杂志
中山大学

分子诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.65
ISSN:1674-6929
年,卷(期):2024.16(4)
  • 18