首页|PCT、D-D联合CRP水平动态检测在脓毒症分级及转归评估中的意义

PCT、D-D联合CRP水平动态检测在脓毒症分级及转归评估中的意义

扫码查看
目的 探讨PCT、D-D联合CRP水平动态检测在脓毒症分级及转归评估中的意义.方法 选取2020年5月至2023年1月承德医学院附属医院收治的112例脓毒症患者设为观察组,另随机选取同期本院进行体检的105名健康人群作为对照组.根据病情严重程度将112例脓毒症患者分为脓毒症组(n=49)、严重脓毒症组(n=35)和脓毒症休克组(n=28),统计患者28d天后生存结局.比较观察组和对照组、不同脓毒症分级患者PCT、D-D、CRP水平及序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHEⅡ),分析PCT、D-D、CRP水平与SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分的相关性以及PCT、D-D、CRP水平及三者联合对脓毒症的预后预测价值.结果 观察组PCT、D-D、CRP水平均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同时间点(入院时、入院 3d、入院 5d、入院 7d)脓毒症休克组PCT、D-D、CRP水平和SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分均高于脓毒症组和严重脓毒症组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);严重脓毒症组PCT、D-D、CRP水平和SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分均高于脓毒症组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);根据随访患者28d天后生存结局分为存活组和死亡组,存活组不同时间点(入院时、入院3d、入院5d、入院7 d)PCT、D-Dz、CRP水平和SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分均低于死亡组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);脓毒症患者PCT、D-D、CRP水平与SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分均呈正相关性(P值均<0.05);ROC曲线显示,入院28d后,PCT、D-D、CRP及三者联合预测脓毒症患者预后情况的AUC分别为 0.830、0.7230、0.765、0.934,三者联合的预测价值更大(P<0.05).结论 PCT、D-D联合CRP水平动态检测可以反映患者病情严重程度和转归情况,可作为脓毒症分级参考指标.
The significance of dynamic detection of PCT and D-D combined with CRP levels in the assessment of sepsis grading and regression
Objective To investigate the significance of dynamic testing of PCT and D-D com-bined with CRP levels in sepsis grading and regression assessment.Methods 112 sepsis patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College from May 2020 to January 2023 were selected as the obser-vation group.Additionally,105 healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations in the hospital dur-ing the same period were randomly selected as the control group.The 112 sepsis patients were divided into the sepsis group(n=49),the severe sepsis group(n=35)and the septic shock group(n=28)based on the severi-ty of their condition.The survival outcomes of the patients after 28 days were analyzed.The study aimed to compare the levels of PCT,D-D,CRP.Sequential Organ Failure Score(SOFA)and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Score(APACHEⅡ)between the observation and the control groups,and among patients with different sepsis grades.Additionally,the correlation between PCT,D-D,CRP levels,SOFA score,APACHEⅡ score,and the impact of PCT,D-D,CRP levels,and their combination on the prognostic predictive value of sepsis were analyzed.Results The levels of PCT,D-D,and CRP in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The levels of PCT,D-D,and CRP and the SOFA scores and APACHEⅡ scores of the septic shock group were higher than those of the sepsis group and the severe sepsis group at different time points(at the time of admission,3 days of ad-mission,5 days of admission,7 days of admission),with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).PCT,D-D,and CRP levels and SOFA score and APACHEⅡ score were higher in the severe sepsis group than in the sepsis group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).According to the survival outcome of the patients after 28 days of follow-up,they were divided into the survival group and the death group.In the survival group,at different time points(at the time of admission,3 days of admission,5 days of admission,and 7 days of admission),PCT,D-D,CRP levels,SOFA score and APACHEⅡ score were low-er than those of the death group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The levels of PCT,D-D,and CRP in sepsis patients were positively correlated with SOFA score and APACHEⅡ score(P values<0.05).The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of PCT,D-D,CRP,and the combination of the three for pre-dicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis after 28 days of admission were 0.830,0.7230,0.765,0.934,re-spectively,and the combined three had greater predictive value(P<0.05).Conclusion Dynamic testing of PCT,D-D combined with CRP levels can reflect the severity of the patient's condition and progression,and can be used as a reference indicator for grading sepsis.

SepsisPCTD-DCRP

赵静媛、张玉红、董龙、吴雪、段立娟、严晓薇、李素清

展开 >

承德医学院附属医院重症医学科,河北,承德 067000

承德医学院附属医院麻醉科,河北,承德 067000

承德医学院附属医院血液检验室,河北,承德 067000

脓毒症 PCT D-D CRP

承德市科学技术研究与发展计划

202109A047

2024

分子诊断与治疗杂志
中山大学

分子诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.65
ISSN:1674-6929
年,卷(期):2024.16(5)
  • 12