首页|两种呼吸支持对NRDS患儿凝血功能、血气指标及氧化应激指标的影响

两种呼吸支持对NRDS患儿凝血功能、血气指标及氧化应激指标的影响

扫码查看
目的 分析NCPAP与HHHFNC支持对NRDS患儿凝血功能、血气指标及氧化应激指标的影响.方法 选取2020年10月至2023年3月蚌埠医学院第二附属医院收治的102例NRDS患儿作为研究对象,均进行无创通气治疗,根据不同的通气方法分为NCPAP组(n=51)与HHHFNC组(n=51).比较两组的呼吸支持治疗相关指标、治疗失败率(72 h内气管插管率)、PS使用率以及并发症发生情况;比较两组治疗前后的凝血功能(TT、PT、APTT、D-D)、血气指标(PaCO2、PaO2、SaO2、LAC)及氧化应激指标(SOD、GSH-PX、MDA.结果 两组无创辅助通气时间、总用氧时间、住院时间、治疗失败率及PS使用率比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.682、1.141、1.099;x2=0.102、0.102,均P>0.05);两组严重呼吸暂停、支气管肺发育不良、颅内出血、坏死性小肠结肠炎、气漏及动脉导管未闭发生率比较无统计学意义(x2=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.136、0.000、0.088,均P>0.05);HHHFNC组的鼻损伤发生率低于NCPAP组,差异具有统计学意义(x2=3.991,P<0.05);两组治疗后的TT、PT、APTT、D-D、PaCO2、PaO2、SaO2、LAC、SOD、GSH-PX及MDA比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.683、0.928、0.780、0.733、1.119、1.345、1.254、0.408、0.544、1.643、1.046,均P>0.05).结论 NCPAP与HHHFNC治疗NRDS的疗效相当,均能够有效改善患儿凝血功能、血气指标及氧化应激,但HHHFNC的安全性更优.
Effects of two types of respiratory support on coagulation function,blood gas index and oxidative stress index in children with NRDS
Objective To analyze the effects of NCPAP and HHHFNC on coagulation function,blood gas index and oxidative stress index of NRDS.Methods A total of 102 children with NRDS treated at the Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Bengbu Medical College from October 2020 to March 2023 were se-lected as the study subjects.All of them were treated with non-invasive ventilation and were divided into the NCPAP group (n=51) and the HHHFNC group (n=51) based on the different ventilation methods.The re-lated indexes of respiratory support therapy,treatment failure rate (tracheal intubation rate within 72 h),utili-zation rate of PS and complications were compared between the two groups.The coagulation function (TT,PT,APTT,D-D),blood gas index (PaCO2,PaO2,SaO2,LAC) and oxidative stress index (SOD,GSH-PX,MDA).Results There were no significant differences in the duration of non-invasive assisted ventila-tion,total oxygen consumption,hospital stay,treatment failure rate and PS utilization rate between the two groups (t=0.682,1.141,1.099;x2=0.102,0.102,P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the inci-dence of severe apnea,bronchopulmonary dysplasia,intracranial hemorrhage,necrotizing enterocolitis,air leakage and patent ductus arteriosus between the two groups (x2=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.136,0.000,0.088,P>0.05).The incidence of nasal injury in the HHHFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NCPAP group (x2=3.991,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in TT,PT,APTT,D-D,PaCO2,PaO2,SaO2,LAC,SOD,GSH-PX,and MDA between the two groups after treatment (t=0.683,0.928,0.780,0.733,1.119,1.345,1.254,0.408,0.544,1.643,1.046,P>0.05).Conclusion NCPAP and HHHFNC have similar efficacy in the treatment of NRDS.Both methods effectively improve coagulation function,blood gas index and oxidative stress in children.However,HHHFNC is safer.

Neonatal respiratory distress syndromeNasal continuous positive airway pressureHeated humidified high flow nasal cannulaCoagulation functionOxidative stress

刘敏敏、彭万胜、贾文婷、杨军、张阵

展开 >

蚌埠医学院第二附属医院儿科,安徽,蚌埠233040

蚌埠医学院第一附属医院儿科,安徽,蚌埠233040

新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征 经鼻持续气道正压通气 加温湿化经鼻导管高流量通气 凝血功能 氧化应激

安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目

KJ2021A0800

2024

分子诊断与治疗杂志
中山大学

分子诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.65
ISSN:1674-6929
年,卷(期):2024.16(7)
  • 1