首页|经前额锁孔入路神经内镜清除术对高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床疗效

经前额锁孔入路神经内镜清除术对高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床疗效

扫码查看
目的 探究经前额锁孔入路神经内镜血肿清除术对高血压基底节区脑出血(HBGH)的临床疗效.方法 选择2022年9月至2023年9月于江苏省人民医院接受手术治疗的HBGH患者65例,其中采取传统血肿清除术治疗 31 例(对照组),采取经前额锁孔入路神经内镜血肿清除术治疗 34 例(研究组).比较两组围术期指标(手术时间、术中出血量、血肿清除率、拔管时间、住院时间、瞳孔恢复时间等)、周围脑水肿体积、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)评分、格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)分级、血清水通道蛋白4(AQP4)水平以及并发症.结果 研究组手术时间比对照组长,术中出血量小,血肿清除率高,瞳孔恢复时间、拔管时间、住院时间短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后 6 个月,两组周围脑水肿体积均降低,且研究组更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组NIHSS评分以及血清AQP4水平均降低,且研究组更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组GOS分级优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后2周,两组GCS评分均升高,且研究组更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).研究组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 经前额锁孔入路神经内镜血肿清除术血肿清除效果好,还能减轻脑水肿体积,促进患者神经功能早期恢复.
Clinical efficacy of neuroendoscopic clearance via frontal keyhole approach for hyperten-sive basal ganglia hemorrhage
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of neuroendoscopic hematoma clearance through the frontal keyhole approach for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage(HBGH).Methods From September 2022 to September 2023,65 patients with HBGH who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital were selected.Among them,31 cases were treated with traditional hematoma removal surgery(control group),and 34 cases were treated with neuroendoscopic hematoma removal surgery through the frontal key-hole approach(test group).Perioperative indicators(surgical time,intraoperative bleeding volume,hema-toma clearance rate,extubation time,hospitalization time,pupil recovery time,etc.)were compared between both groups.Peripheral cerebral edema volume,National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)score,Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)score,Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)grading,serum aquaporin 4(AQP4)level,and complications were analyzed between the two groups.Results The study group had a longer surgi-cal time,less intraoperative bleeding,a higher hematoma clearance rate,a shorter pupil recovery time,extu-bation time,and hospitalization time compared to the control group,and the differences were statistically sig-nificant(P<0.05).Six months after surgery,the volume of peripheral brain edema decreased in both groups,with the study group showing a lower volume,and a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Both groups demonstrated a decrease in NIHSS scores and serum AQP4 levels,with the study group having even lower scores,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The GOS grading of the research group was better than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Two weeks after surgery,both groups showed an increase in GCS scores,with the study group having a higher score,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Neuroen-doscopic hematoma removal surgery using the frontal keyhole approach has a positive impact on removing he-matomas,reducing brain edema,and promoting early recovery of neurological function in patients.

Hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhageNeuroendoscopic hematoma removal surgery through the frontal keyhole approachAquaporin 4Cerebral edema

徐笑、魏栋、王协锋、陈功

展开 >

江苏省人民医院(南京医科大学第一附属医院)神经外科,江苏,南京 210029

高血压性基底节区脑出血 前额锁孔入路神经内镜血肿清除术 水通道蛋白4 脑水肿

2024

分子诊断与治疗杂志
中山大学

分子诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.65
ISSN:1674-6929
年,卷(期):2024.16(12)