首页|中国城市绿色低碳发展效率的组态分析——基于有为政府与有效市场协同视角

中国城市绿色低碳发展效率的组态分析——基于有为政府与有效市场协同视角

扫码查看
基于2019-2021年中国258个地级市数据,运用NCA和fsQCA混合方法,从有为政府与有效市场协同视角对中国城市绿色低碳发展效率的驱动路径进行系统阐释,并进一步识别沿海、内陆城市绿色低碳发展效率的差异化路径.研究发现:单一的有为政府或有效市场变量均不是提高中国城市绿色低碳发展效率的必要条件.中国城市绿色低碳发展效率的驱动路径可归为四类,分别是政府助力下的市场主导型、市场主导下的技术驱动型、市场驱动下的政府主导型、政府与市场协同联动主导型.中国沿海与内陆城市在绿色低碳发展效率提升路径上存在差异,沿海城市通常采取更为多样化的路径,而内陆城市则主要依赖市场主导的技术驱动路径.
Configuration Analysis of Urban Green Low-carbon Development Efficiency in China:A Synergistic Perspective of Active Government and Efficient Markets
This study investigates the driving mechanisms of urban green low-carbon development efficiency based on data from 258 prefecture-level cities in China between 2019 and 2021,with a focus on government-market synergy.Using a combination of Necessary Condition Analysis(NCA)and Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA),it identifies differentiated pathways for enhancing efficiency in coastal and inland cities.The research findings show that neither a proactive government nor an efficient market alone is a necessary condition for improving green low-carbon development efficiency.The driving pathways are categorized into four types:market-driven with government support,technology-driven under market leadership,government-led with market support,and a synergistic model where both government and market play dominant roles.There are differences in the efficiency improvement path of green and low-carbon development between coastal and inland cities in China.The coastal cities typically follow a broader range of pathways,while inland cities primarily rely on the technology-driven market leadership pathway.

green low-carbon development efficiencyactive governmenteffective marketfuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA)

唐天伟、吴素婷、江晓婧

展开 >

江西师范大学管理科学与工程研究中心

绿色低碳发展效率 有为政府 有效市场 模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)

2024

改革
重庆社会科学院

改革

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.418
ISSN:1003-7543
年,卷(期):2024.(10)