工程抗震与加固改造2024,Vol.46Issue(4) :50-58.DOI:10.16226/j.issn.1002-8412.2024.04.007

大跨度铁路斜拉桥地震易损性研究

Seismic vulnerability analysis of large-span railway cable-stayed bridges

陈银灯
工程抗震与加固改造2024,Vol.46Issue(4) :50-58.DOI:10.16226/j.issn.1002-8412.2024.04.007

大跨度铁路斜拉桥地震易损性研究

Seismic vulnerability analysis of large-span railway cable-stayed bridges

陈银灯1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,陕西西安 710043
  • 折叠

摘要

为研究大跨度铁路斜拉桥在地震作用下的损坏规律,以某铁路斜拉桥为研究对象,建立OpenSees有限元非线性动力时程分析模型,采用人工合成的20条地震波作为地震动,基于增量动力分析法计算分析斜拉桥在纵向地震和横向地震作用下桥梁构件的易损性曲线,并采用一阶界限法和二阶界限法计算桥梁系统易损性,结果表明:(1)支座在PGA为0.1g的纵向地震和横向地震作用下,轻微破坏的概率分别为70%和85%,中等破坏的概率为40%和60%,说明支座横向先于纵向发生破坏;(2)当PGA<0.2g时,桥墩和桥塔均不会发生破坏,但随着地震动增大,桥墩沿纵桥向损坏的概率大于横桥向,桥塔沿纵桥向损坏的概率小于横桥向;(3)一阶界限法和二阶界限法在轻微破坏上下界最大差值分别为0.15和0.07,中等破坏为0.03和0.06,严重破坏为0.25和0.02,完全破坏为0.23和0.02,说明二阶界限法可明显减小上下界的间距.

Abstract

In order to study the damage law of large-span railway cable-stayed bridges under earthquake actions,a certain railway cable-stayed bridge was taken as the research project.Finite element nonlinear dynamic time history analysis model was established on OpenSees platform,20 artificial synthesized seismic waves were used as seismic motions.Based on the incremental dynamic analysis method,the vulnerability curves of the bridge components under longitudinal and transverse seismic actions were calculated and analyzed for the cable-stayed bridge.The first and second order boundary methods were used to calculate the vulnerability of the bridge system.The results indicate that under longitudinal and transverse seismic actions with PGA of 0.1g,the probability of minor damage is 70%and 85%respectively,and the probability of moderate damage is 40%and 60%respectively,and this means that the lateral failure of the supports occurs before the longitudinal failure.When PGA is less than 0.2g,neither the bridge pier nor the bridge tower will be damaged.However,as the ground motion increases,the probability of damage to the bridge pier under the longitudinal bridge action is greater than that under the transverse bridge action,and the probability of damage to the bridge tower under the longitudinal bridge action is less than that under the transverse bridge action.The maximum difference between the upper and lower boundaries of the first order and second order boundary methods is 0.15 and 0.07 for minor damage,0.03 and 0.06 for moderate damage,0.25 and 0.02 for severe damage,and 0.23 and 0.02 for complete damage.This indicates that the second order boundary method can significantly reduce the spacing between the upper and lower boundaries.

关键词

铁路桥梁/易损性/数值分析/斜拉桥/损伤指标/动力时程分析/界限法

Key words

railway bridge/seismic vulnerability/numerical calculation/cable-stayed bridge/damage indicator/dynamic time history analysis/boundary estimation method

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司科研课题(院科20-34)

中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司科研课题(院科19-12)

中国铁建股份公司科研计划课题(2019-40)

出版年

2024
工程抗震与加固改造
中国建筑学会 中国建筑科学研究院

工程抗震与加固改造

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.502
ISSN:1002-8412
参考文献量11
段落导航相关论文