首页|"规制"抑或"自由":理工科拔尖本科生科研参与的行为分化及其成因研究

"规制"抑或"自由":理工科拔尖本科生科研参与的行为分化及其成因研究

扫码查看
本研究基于"个体—环境"天赋行动理论,对理工科拔尖本科生的科研参与行为分化及其成因进行探索.研究发现,在"自由"与"规制"的培养模式下,理工科拔尖本科生的科研参与均存在着高—低自主的行为分化,即"自由"模式下自我负责的积极尝试与畏难心理的消极回避,"规制"模式下集体归属的学徒模仿与疲于应对的浅尝辄止.而分化成因是课程设置、导师指导、实验模式、评价标准四类环境因素.上述发现丰富了学界对于拔尖本科生科研参与的理论认知,补充了"类型学"视角.研究建议,不应片面看待"自由"或"规制"的观点,"自由"或"规制"需要形成配合,关键在于回应个体诉求、并建立多元动态的培养目标.
"Regulation"or"Freedom":Research on the Behavioral Differentiation and Causes of Scientific Research Participation of Top-notch Undergraduates in Science and Engineering
Based on the"individual-environment"innate action theory,this study explores the differentia-tion and causes of scientific research participation behavior of top-notch undergraduates in science and engi-neering.The study found that under the training mode of"freedom"and"regulation",there is a high-low au-tonomous behavior differentiation in the scientific research participation of top-notch undergraduates in science and engineering,that is,the positive attempt of self-responsibility and the negative avoidance of fear of difficul-ties under the"freedom"mode,the apprenticeship imitation of collective belonging under the"regulation"mode and the shallow taste of being tired of coping.The causes of differentiation are four environmental factors:curriculum setting,tutor guidance,experimental mode and evaluation standard.The above findings enrich the academic community's theoretical understanding of top-notch students participation in scientific research and supplement the"typology"perspective.The study suggests that we should not take a one-sided view of"free-dom"or"regulation"."Freedom"and"regulation"needs to be coordinated.The key is to respond to individual demands and establish a multi-dynamic training goal.

top-notch innovative talents trainingundergraduate research participationscience and engi-neeringinnate action theory

刘晓蒙

展开 >

南京大学 教育研究院,江苏 南京 210023

拔尖创新人才培养 本科生科研参与 理工科 天赋行动理论

2024

高等理科教育
兰州大学 中国高等教育学会理科教育专业委员会

高等理科教育

影响因子:0.982
ISSN:1000-4076
年,卷(期):2024.(6)