首页|农牧交错区农牧民生计韧性差异化提升对策研究—以天祝藏族自治县为例

农牧交错区农牧民生计韧性差异化提升对策研究—以天祝藏族自治县为例

扫码查看
基于典型农牧交错区天祝藏族自治县309 户农牧民实地调研数据,通过构建包含缓冲能力、自组织能力及学习能力三维度的农牧民生计韧性分析框架,运用生计韧性综合指数法和方差分析法比较分析不同生计类型生计韧性差异及差异来源.结果表明:1)该区域农牧民生计类型主要有纯牧型、半农半牧型、农工兼业型及非农型4 类,其中纯牧型和半农半牧型较多.2)农牧民生计韧性指数平均值为0.3689,整体水平偏低.生计韧性指数从高到低依次为非农型(0.4974)>农工兼业型(0.3688)>半农半牧型(0.3292)>纯牧型(0.3203),存在显著差异.3)不同生计类型农牧民生计韧性提升的制约因素不同.纯牧型核心制约因素为人力资本薄弱、生计类型单一;半农半牧型主要受限于家庭教育投入不足、信息获取能力弱;而农工兼业型和非农型的主要制约因素为资金补助不足、社会参与度低.据此,针对纯牧型,提出应强化人力资本,引导农牧民参与草原生态旅游、特色畜产品电商等新兴产业,实现生计多元化;针对半农半牧型,应加大教育资本投入,提供就业技能培训及岗位推荐等信息服务;针对农工兼业型和非农型,应配套必要的政策与专项补助,引导社会资本投入,建立多元化融资渠道,提升农牧民组织化程度和自我提升意识,充分挖掘创业潜力.
Differentiated improvement of livelihood resilience of farmers and herdsmen in the agricultural-pastoral ecotone:A case of Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County,China
In the study,309 farmers and herdsmen in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous Countya typical agro-pastoral ecotone,were surveyed,and a framework including three dimensions(buffering capacity,self-organising capacity,and learning capacity)for analyzing the resilience of farmers and herdsmen's livelihoods was constructed.Composite Index of Livelihood Resilience(CILR)method and analysis of variance(ANOVA)were used to comparatively analyze the differences and the sources of the differences in livelihood resilience of farmers and herdsmen with different livelihood strategies.The findings are as follows:1)There are four types of livelihood strategies in this region:pure stock raising,semi-farming and semi-stock raising,farming-working engage in industrial work,and non-agricultural,in which the pure stock raising,and semi-farming and semi-stock raising are the main types.2)The average value of the livelihood resilience index for farmers and herders is 0.3689,which is low overall.The level of livelihood resilience of the four livelihood types from high to low are non-agricultural type(0.4974)>farming-working engage in industrial work(0.3688)>semi-farming and semi-stock raising(0.3292)>pure stock raising(0.3203),with significant differences.3)The constraints on increasing the livelihood resilience of farmers and herdsmen are different.Specifically,the core constraints for the pure stock raising type are the weak human capital and singulation of livelihood.The type of semi-farming and semi-stock raising is mainly limited by insufficient investment in family education and weak access to information.The main constraints for the types of farming-working engage in industrial work and non-agricultural are the insufficient financial subsidies and low social participation.Accordingly,for the pure stock raising,it is proposed that human capital should be strengthened,and farmers and herdsmen should be guided to participate in emerging industries such as grassland eco-tourism and e-commerce of speciality livestock products to diversify their livelihoods.For the semi-farming and semi-stock raising,the capital investment in education should be increased,and information services such as job skills training and job recommendation should be provided.For the types of semi-farming and semi-stock raising,and non-agricultural,the necessary policy support and special subsidies should be provided,diversified financing channels be established,the organization degree of farmers and herdsmen and their sense of self-improvement be enhanced,to fully exploit their entrepreneurial potential.

agro-pastoral ecotonelivelihood resilience of farmers and herdsmenlivelihood strategiesTianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County

杨婕妤、陈强强、崔秀娟

展开 >

甘肃农业大学财经学院,兰州 730070

生态建设与环境保护研究中心,兰州 730070

西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,杨凌 712100

农牧交错区 农牧民生计韧性 生计类型 天祝藏族自治县

甘肃省人文社会科学项目甘肃省高校教师创新基金项目甘肃农业大学青年导师基金项目

22ZZ812024B-074GAU-QDFC-2022-20

2024

干旱区资源与环境
中国自然资源学会干旱半干旱地区研究委员会 内蒙古农业大学

干旱区资源与环境

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.492
ISSN:1003-7578
年,卷(期):2024.38(10)