首页|股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的应用效果

股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法 选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉组(F/I组)和腰硬联合麻醉组(CSEA组),每组60例。F/I组中男32例,女28例,年龄(38。75±11。35)岁;CSEA组中男25例,女35例,年龄(37。80±10。85)岁。比较两组术中补救例数、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后感觉恢复时间及首次下地活动时间、术后并发症、住院花费及住院天数等指标的差异。采用t检验、x2检验、Fisher确切概率法。结果 F/I组术后6hVAS评分低于CSEA组[(2。08±0。61)分比(2。54±0。64)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-2。484,P=0。018)。F/I组感觉恢复时间长于CSEA组[(6。25±0。40)h比(3。60±0。31)h,首次下地活动时间短于CESA组[(2。99±1。05)h比(8。14±1。88)h],差异均有统计学意义(t=14。095、-12。263,均P<0。001)。术后并发症:F/I组术中加用麻醉发生率3。3%(2/60)、尿潴留发生率0、下肢静脉血栓发生率1。7%(1/60)、恶心呕吐发生率3。3%(2/60),CSEA组术中加用麻醉发生率0、尿潴留发生率10。0%(6/60)、下肢静脉血栓发生率5。0%(3/60)、恶心呕吐发生率16。7%(10/60),两组尿潴留、恶心呕吐发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05)。F/I组住院时间为(3。90±0。63)d、住院费用为(9 612。67±507。15)元,CESA组分别为(5。27±0。75)d、(11 401。52±530。01)元,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8。862、-15。425,均P<0。001)。结论 股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中能够减少术后并发症、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用,并提供良好的麻醉效果。
Application effect of femoral nerve block combined with intra-articular anaesthesia in knee arthroscopy
Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of femoral nerve block combined with intra-articular anaesthesia in knee arthroscopy.Methods A total of 120 patients who planned to undergo unilateral knee arthroscopic surgery due to meniscus injury,loose body,or osteoarthritis in Department of Bone and Joint Surgery,Binzhou Medical University Hospital from January to June 2022 were selected.The patients were randomly divided into a femoral nerve block combined with joint cavity infiltration anesthesia group(F/I group)and a combined spinal-epidural anesthesia group(CSEA group),with 60 patients in each group.In the F/I group,there were 32 males and 28 females,aged(38.75±11.35)years.In the CSEA group,there were 25 males and 35 females,aged(37.80±10.85)years.The differences in the number of intraoperative rescue cases,postoperative Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)score,postoperative sensory recovery time,first ambulation time,postoperative complications,hospitalization cost,and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.ttest,x2 test,and Fisher exact probability method were used.Results The VAS score of the F/I group 6 h after operation was lower than that of the CSEA group[(2.08±0.61)points vs.(2.54±0.64)points],with a statistically significant difference(t=-2.484,P=0.018).The sensory recovery time of the F/I group was longer than that of the CSEA group[(6.25±0.40)h vs.(3.60±0.31)h],and the first ambulation time was shorter than that of the CESA group[(2.99±1.05)h vs.(8.14± 1.88)h],with statistically significant differences(t=14.095 and-12.263,both P<0.001).The postoperative complications:the incidence of intraoperative anesthesia in the F/I group was 3.3%(2/60),the incidence of urinary retention was 0,the incidence of lower extremity venous thrombosis was 1.7%(1/60),and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 3.3%(2/60);in the CSEA group,the incidence of postoperative anesthesia was 0,the incidence of urinary retention was 10.0%(6/60),the incidence of lower extremity venous thrombosis was 5.0%(3/60),and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 16.7%(10/60);there were statistically significant differences in the incidence of urinary retention and nausea and vomiting between the two groups(both P<0.05).The length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost in the F/I group were(3.90±0.63)d and(9 612.67±507.15)yuan,and those in the CESA group were(5.27±0.75)d and(11 401.52± 530.01)yuan,with statistically significant differences(t=-8.862 and-15.425,both P<0.001).Conclusion Femoral nerve block combined with intra-articular infiltration anesthesia in knee arthroscopic surgery can reduce the postoperative complications,shorten the length of hospital stay,reduce the cost of hospitalization,and provide a good anesthetic effect.

Femoral nerve blockCombined spinal-epidural anesthesiaKnee arthroscopyIntra-articular anaesthesiaMeniscus injurySurgical complications

林振州、刘明廷、张成年、李健、马明亮

展开 >

滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科,滨州 256600

股神经阻滞 腰硬联合麻醉 膝关节镜手术 关节腔浸润麻醉 半月板损伤 术后并发症

2024

国际医药卫生导报
中华医学会,国际医药卫生导报社

国际医药卫生导报

影响因子:0.781
ISSN:1007-1245
年,卷(期):2024.30(2)
  • 10