首页|中药药熨联合皮内针对气滞血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察

中药药熨联合皮内针对气滞血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察

扫码查看
目的 观察中药药熨联合皮内针对气滞血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者的短期及远期效果。方法 选取2021年3月至2023年3月在广东省第二中医院骨三科住院的气滞血瘀型LDH患者70例,采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各35例。对照组男17例,女18例;年龄45~60(68。20±11。54)岁;病程 1~3(2。51±0。94)年。观察组男 19例,女 16例;年龄45~60(69。69±3。54)岁;病程1~3(2。54±1。06)年。两组均给予骨科常规护理,对照组采用口服塞来昔布治疗,观察组在对照组基础上采用中药药熨联合皮内针治疗。两组均连续治疗14d,3个月后给予电话随访。比较两组患者治疗前、治疗3 d后、治疗14 d后、治疗后3个月视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会腰椎功能量表(JOA)评分。观察两组患者治疗前后临床表现改善情况,进行疗效评价。采用独立样本t检验、配对样本t检验和x2检验。结果 观察组治疗3d后、治疗14d后、治疗后3个月VAS评分[(3。97±0。95)分、(3。91±0。89)分、(3。74±0。74)分]均低于对照组[(6。46±1。15)分、(6。23±0。94)分、(6。29±1。15)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05)。观察组治疗3d后、治疗14d后、治疗后3个月JOA评分[(21。74±1。52)分、(22。03±1。38)分、(22。51±1。20)分]均高于对照组[(18。83±1。51)分、(19。49±1。34)分、(20。26±1。07)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05)。观察组总有效率为94。29%(33/35),高于对照组的65。71%(23/35),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 中药药熨联合皮内针治疗气滞血瘀型LDH,不仅起效快,改善疼痛、腰椎功能,总体疗效亦优于单用塞来昔布。
Effect of Chinese medicine hot compress therapy combined with intradermal needling on patients with lumbar disc herniation of the qi stagnation-blood stasis type
Objective To observe the short-term and long-term effects of Chinese medicine hot compress therapy combined with intradermal needling on patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH)of the qi stagnation-blood stasis type.Methods A total of 70 patients with LDH of the qi stagnation-blood stasis type admitted to the department of orthopedics,Guangdong Second Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2021 to March 2023 were selected and were divided into an observation group and a control group by the random number table method,with 35 cases in each group.There were 17 males and 18 females in the control group,aged 45-60(68.20±11.54)years,and the course of disease was 1-3(2.51±0.94)years.There were 19 males and 16 females in the observation group,aged 45-60(69.69±3.54)years,and the course of disease was 1-3(2.54±1.06)years.Both groups were given orthopedic nursing care,the control group was given celecoxib,and the observation group was treated with Chinese medicine hot compress therapy combined with intradermal needling on the basis of the control group.Both groups were treated continuously for 14 days,and a telephone follow-up was conducted 3 months after treatment.The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores and Japanese Orthopedic Association Lumbar Function Scale(JOA)scores were compared before treatment,after 3 days of treatment,after 14 days of treatment,and 3 months after treatment.The improvement of clinical performance before and after treatment was observed and the curative effect was evaluated.Independent sample t test,paired t test,and x2 test were used.Results The VAS scores of the observation group after 3 days of treatment,after 14 days of treatment,and 3 months after treatment[(3.97±0.95)points,(3.91±0.89)points,and(3.74±0.74)points]were lower than those of the control group[(6.46±1.15)points,(6.23±0.94)points,and(6.29±1.15)points],with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).The JOA scores of the observation group after 3 days of treatment,after 14 days of treatment,and 3 months after treatment were(21.74±1.52)points,(22.03±1.38)points,(22.51±1.20)points,respectively,which were higher than those of the control group[(18.83±1.51)points,(19.49±1.34)points,and(20.26±1.07)points],with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.29%(33/35),which was higher than that of the control group[65.71%(23/35)],with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Combination of Chinese medicine hot compress therapy and intradermal needling for LDH patients with the qi stagnation-blood stasis type not only can relieve the pain and improve the lumbar spine function in the short term,but also has better overall efficacy than using celecoxib alone.

Lumbar disc herniationQi stagnation-blood stasis typeIntradermal needlingChinese medicine hot compress therapy

刘琪玉、李沙、易建军、陈梦

展开 >

广东省第二中医院骨科,广州 510095

腰椎间盘突出症 气滞血瘀型 皮内针 中药药熨

广东省中医药局科研项目

20211037

2024

国际医药卫生导报
中华医学会,国际医药卫生导报社

国际医药卫生导报

影响因子:0.781
ISSN:1007-1245
年,卷(期):2024.30(14)