首页|漓江流域景观生态风险时空演变及风险评价

漓江流域景观生态风险时空演变及风险评价

扫码查看
基于2000、2005、2010、2015、2019年的Landsat TM/OLI遥感数据,对漓江流域土地利用情况进行解译,定量和定性分析了该区土地利用的时空分布特征;应用RS与GIS技术构建景观生态风险评价模型,对漓江流域景观生态风险时空演变特征进行分析,并揭示土地利用变化和景观生态风险的耦合关联性.结果表明:(1)研究区土地利用类型以林地和耕地为主,土地利用类型之间均发生了变更,主要表现为耕地变更为林地和建设用地.其中,建设用地、水域和林地面积逐年增多,研究期间分别增长70.62、32.44、75.83 km2,耕地面积共计减少166.33 km2.(2)研究区整体生态风险水平下降,低生态风险区先降后增,较高和高生态风险区先增后降:2010-2019年,低生态风险区面积增加282.64 km2,较高生态风险区和高生态风险区面积分别减少206.80和71.74 km2.(3)南部耕地转化为林地的面积和速率均高于北部地区,导致景观生态风险质心由北向南偏移了 6.32 km.(4)2000-2019年,研究区的景观生态风险Moran's I值均大于0.65,空间正相关性较强且趋于集聚;LISA集聚图空间分布与同期的土地格局分布较为一致,说明人为活动对漓江流域的干扰在一定程度上影响着该区域的景观生态风险.
Spatial-temporal variations and risk assessment of the landscape ecosystem of Lijiang River basin
Based on Landsat TM/OLI remote sensing images from 2000,2005,2010,2015 and 2019,this study conducts land use interpretation in the Lijiang River basin,and quantitatively and qualitatively analyzes the spatial-temporal distribution of land use.RS and GIS technologies are applied to construct a landscape eco-logical risk assessment model.It analyzes the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of landscape ecological risks in the Lijiang River basin,and it reveals the coupling relationship between land use change and landscape ecological risks.The results indicate that:(1)Land use types of the research area are mainly forest land and cultivated land,and there have changes between land use types,mainly manifested as the transformation of cul-tivated land into forest land and construction land.The area of construction land,water bodies,and forest land has been increasing year by year,with an increase of 70.62,32.44 and 75.83 km2 respectively during research period.The total area of cultivated land has decreased by 166.33 km2.(2)The overall ecological risk level of the research area has decreased,with low ecological risk areas decreasing first and then increasing,and higher and high ecological risk areas increasing first and then decreasing:from 2010 to 2019,the area of low ecological risk areas has increased by 282.64 km2,while the area of higher and high ecological risk areas decreased by 206.80 and 71.74 km2,respectively.(3)The area and rate of converting cultivated land into forest land in the southern part are higher than those in the northern part,resulting in a 6.32 km shift in the landscape ecological risk centroid from north to south.(4)The Moran's I values of landscape ecological risks in the research area from 2000 to 2019 are all greater than 0.65,indicating a strong spatial positive correlation and a tendency towards clustering.The spatial distribution of the LISA cluster map is consistent with the land pattern distribution during the same period,indicating that human activities have a certain degree of impact on the landscape ecological risk of the Lijiang River basin.

landscape ecology riskland use changespatial-temporal variationrisk centroidrisk assess-mentLijiang River basin

赵鹏伟、钱建平、刘佳雷、龙思远

展开 >

桂林理工大学地球科学学院,广西桂林 541006

桂林理工大学广西隐伏金属矿产勘查重点实验室,广西桂林 541006

景观生态风险 土地利用变化 时空演变 风险质心 风险评价 漓江流域

国家自然科学基金项目

41561095

2024

桂林理工大学学报
桂林理工大学

桂林理工大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.618
ISSN:1674-9057
年,卷(期):2024.44(3)