首页|教师智能素养评价的国际研究:主体、要素、工具与建议

教师智能素养评价的国际研究:主体、要素、工具与建议

扫码查看
智能素养已成为智能时代教师开展教育教学活动应具备的基本素养.当前,关于教师智能素养评价方面的研究尚不够成熟,为厘清教师智能素养评价的现状,基于文献分析,从教师智能素养评价的主体、要素、工具等方面出发,对近年来国际上关于教师智能素养评价的实证研究与实践案例进行了梳理,结果发现:教师智能素养评价主体呈现出以政府部门等官方机构为主导的多元化特点;评价要素构成多样又存在共性,包含智能知识、智能能力、智能意识、智能伦理等;评价工具既有结果取向又有过程取向,测评题目形式分为封闭性和开放性两大类.在此基础上,研究者结合国内教师智能素养评价的现实需求及智能化教学实际场景,从主体多元化、要素多样化、工具智能化三个维度,探索教师智能素养评价的实践方向,提出开展分层分类的协同评价、数智驱动的全面评价、精准情境化的追踪评价等建议,以期为教师智能素养评价实践发展提供参考.
Review of International Research on the Assessment of Teachers'Artificial Intelligence Literacy:Subjects,Elements,Tools and Recommendations
AI literacy has become the basic literacy for teachers to carry out educational and teaching activities in the intelligent era.The current research on teachers'AI literacy evaluation is not mature enough.In order to clarify the current situation of teachers'AI literacy evaluation,this paper,based on literature analysis,reviews the empirical research and practical cases on teachers'intelligent literacy evaluation in recent years from the aspects of the subject,elements and tools of teachers'AI literacy evaluation.The results showed that:the subject of teachers'AI literacy assessment is diversified,with governmental and other official organizations as the dominant features;the evaluation elements are diverse and common,including intelligent knowledge,intelligent ability,intelligent consciousness,intelligent ethics,etc;the evaluation tools are both result-oriented and process-oriented;and the assessment questions are divided into two categories:closed and open.On this basis,the researcher combines the real demand for teachers'AI literacy evaluation and the actual scene of intelligent teaching in China,explores the practical direction of teachers'AI literacy evaluation from three dimensions of diversified subjects,diversified elements,and intelligent tools,and puts forward the suggestions of collaborative evaluation of hierarchical classification,comprehensive evaluation driven by numerical intelligence,and accurate contextualized tracking evaluation,in order to provide a reference for the development of the practice of teachers'AI literacy evaluation.The paper also suggested to carry out collaborative evaluation of hierarchical classification,comprehensive evaluation driven by digital intelligence,and accurate contextualized tracking evaluation,with a view to providing reference for the development of teachers'AI literacy evaluation practice.

Artificial intelligent literacyTeacher developmentEvaluation subjectEvaluation elementEvaluation tool

杜华、袁璐欣、王璐瑶

展开 >

浙江师范大学教育学院(浙江金华 321004)

智能素养 教师发展 评价主体 评价要素 评价工具

国家社会科学基金 "十四五"规划2021年度教育学一般课题

BCA210091

2024

中国教育信息化
教育部教育管理信息中心

中国教育信息化

影响因子:0.786
ISSN:1673-8454
年,卷(期):2024.30(4)
  • 2
  • 40