In the 2006"Da Vinci Code"lawsuit,the London High Court rejected the plaintiff's lawsuit on the grounds that the reproduction of the viewpoint did not infringe on the copyright of the original work.This legal interpretation that only focu-ses on expression and neglects meaning or function is not sufficient.In order to dispel the confusion in the minds of readers and provide justice to Dan Brown,it is necessary to conduct a intertextual analysis of the two works involved in the case.In sum-mary,the place where"The Da Vinci Code"surpasses"The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail"is that it supplements historical facts with imagination,weaves stories with codes,and dissolves truth with games.
The Da Vinci Codelegal breakthroughintertextual writing
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
维普
