赣南医学院学报2024,Vol.44Issue(4) :335-342,348.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2024.04.002

奥希替尼联合贝伐珠单抗治疗晚期EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌疗效与安全性的Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab as the treatment for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer:a Meta-analysis

曾田莉 周建荣
赣南医学院学报2024,Vol.44Issue(4) :335-342,348.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2024.04.002

奥希替尼联合贝伐珠单抗治疗晚期EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌疗效与安全性的Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab as the treatment for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer:a Meta-analysis

曾田莉 1周建荣2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 赣南医科大学第一临床医学院
  • 2. 赣南医科大学第一附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科,江西 赣州 341000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:系统评价奥希替尼(Osimertinib,AZD)联合贝伐珠单抗(Bevacizumab,BEV)治疗晚期表皮生长因子受体(Epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者的疗效和安全性.方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane library、Web of science、中国知网(CNKI)、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(China biology medicine database,CBM)等数据库建库至2022年12月符合纳入和排除标准的文献,并进行质量评价和资料提取,用Review Manager 5.4及Stata 17.0软件进行Meta分析.结果:共纳入11篇研究文献,721例患者.Meta分析结果显示:在疗效上,试验组(AZD和BEV联合给药)客观缓解率(Objective response rate,ORR)优于对照组(AZD单用药),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组无进展生存期(Progression free survival,PFS)及疾病控制率(Disease control rate,DCR)较对照组稍好,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组总生存期(Overall survival,OS)较对照组稍短,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).在安全性上,试验组3级以上不良事件发生率(Grade≥3 AEs)与对照组相比明显升高(P<0.05).进一步亚组分析显示,2组在试验组给予不同剂量BEV时,ORR、PFS、OS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组予以AZD(80 mg qd)+BEV(7.5 mg·m-2)q3w时所达到的DCR优于对照组(P<0.05);试验组予以AZD(80 mg qd)+BEV(7.5 mg·m-2)q3w时Grade≥3 AEs发生率与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:AZD联合BEV治疗能显著提高晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者的ORR,但在DCR、PFS、OS方面无明显获益,且增加了Grade≥3 AEs.

Abstract

Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib(AZD)combined with bevacizumab(BEV)as the treatment for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)mutant non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:Databases including PubMed,The cochrane library,Embase,Web of science,CNKI,VIP database,Wanfang database and China biology medicine database(CBM)were searched by computer,documents until December 2022 that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated for quality and data extraction.Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software were used for Meta-analysis.Results:Eleven research articles were included,involving 721 patients.The results of Meta-analysis showed that:in terms of efficacy,the objective response rate(ORR)of the experimental group(AZD combined with BEV)was better than that of the control group(AZD monotherapy),with statistical significance(P<0.05).Progression-free survival(PFS)and disease control rate(DCR)in experimental group were slightly better than those in control group,but with no significant differences(P>0.05).The overall survival time(OS)of experimental group was slightly shorter than control group,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).As for the safety,the incidence of Grade 3 or higher adverse events(Grade≥3 AEs)in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Further subgroup analysis showed that there were no statistical differences in ORR,PFS and OS between the two groups when different doses of BEV were given in the experimental group(P>0.05).The DCR achieved better in experimental group than control group when the experimental group given BEV(7.5 mg·m-2)q3w(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of Grade≥3 AEs between the experimental group and the control group when BEV was gave for(7.5 mg·m-2)q3w(P>0.05).Conclusion:AZD combined with BEV significantly improved ORR in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC,but had no significant benefit in DCR,PFS,OS and increased the risk of Grade≥3 AEs.

关键词

奥希替尼/贝伐珠单抗/表皮生长因子受体/癌,非小细胞肺/疗效/安全性/Meta分析

Key words

Osimertinib/Bevacizumab/Epidermal growth factor receptor/Carcinoma,Non-small-cell lung/Efficacy/Safety/Meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
赣南医学院学报
赣南医学院

赣南医学院学报

影响因子:0.622
ISSN:1001-5779
参考文献量31
段落导航相关论文