首页|"实然"与"应然"互动视角下的"合理即现实,现实即合理"命题

"实然"与"应然"互动视角下的"合理即现实,现实即合理"命题

扫码查看
黑格尔的命题"合理即现实,现实即合理"原本是在实然与应然互动的语境中提出来的。一方面,它不仅肯定了现实与理性的实然统一,而且讨论了应然如何变成实然的深刻问题,包含着值得汲取的积极因素;另一方面,除了忽视现实与感性和非理性的实然统一外,由于不了解认知需要与非认知需要的区分对实然与应然关系的决定性作用,尤其是由于片面夸大了理性思维的意义,它不仅直接赋予了现实与理性的实然统一"应当如此"的应然意蕴,而且主张"应当如此"的诉求能够因为"合乎理性"的缘故直接成为"真实如此"的现实,结果在实然与应然的混淆中体现出"理性自负"的自败悖论。
The Proposition of Hegel's Proposition of"What is Rational is Real;and What is Real is Rational"from the Perspective of Interaction between"Being"and"Oughtness"
Hegel's proposition"What is rational is real;and what is real is rational"is originally proposed in the context of the interaction between being and oughtness.On the one hand,it not only affirms the unity of reality and rationality in being,but also discusses the profound issue of how oughtness could turn into reality,containing positive factors worth learning from.On the other hand,in addition to neglecting the unity of reality with sensibility and irrationality,it not only directly endows the unity of reality and rationality in being with the normative significance of oughtness,but also holds that the demands of oughtness can directly become the reality merely due to their rationality,because it lacks of understanding of the decisive role of the distinction between cognitive and non-cognitive needs,and exaggerates the significance of rational thinking.As a result,this proposition falls into a self-defeating paradox of"rational arrogance"in the confusion between being and oughtness.

Hegelrealityrationalitybeing and oughtnesscognitive and non-cognitive needs

刘清平

展开 >

武汉传媒学院电影与电视学院,湖北武汉 430205

黑格尔 现实 理性 实然和应然 认知需要和非认知需要

2024

贵州大学学报(社会科学版)
贵州大学

贵州大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.566
ISSN:1000-5099
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 25