首页|微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的疗效与安全性比较

微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的疗效与安全性比较

扫码查看
目的 比较分析微通道经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)与输尿管软镜碎石术(RIRS)治疗上尿路结石(结石长径为2.0~3.0 cm)的疗效与安全性.方法 回顾性研究2018年2月至2021年10月在本院确诊的72例上尿路结石患者的临床资料,将患者随机分为MPCNL组(给予MPCNL治疗)和RIRS组(给予RIRS治疗),每组各36例.记录两组患者的、术后1周、1个月、3个月的结石清除率、血清炎性指标[肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-4(IL-4)和白细胞介素-2(IL-2)]、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、肾功能指标、手术相关并发症和二期手术情况.结果 与MPCNL组比较,RIRS组的术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、血肌酐、尿素氮降低,而住院费用增加,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).RIRS组术后1周、术后1个月的结石清除率均较MPCNL组降低(x2=4.126、5.258,均P<0.05).术后 3 d,RIRS 组患者的 TNF-α、IL-6、IL-2 均较 MPCNL 组升高,而 IL-10、IL-4、VAS评分均较MPCNL组降低(均P<0.05).两组患者的并发症比较,差异无统计意义(x2=0.127,P=0.722).与MPCNL组比,RIRS组患者的二期手术例数较多,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.235,P=0.040).结论 MPCNL与RIRS均可治疗结石长径为2.0~3.0cm的上尿路结石患者,两者各有优缺点.MPCNL费用较低,但术中出血量较高,炎症反应较低;RIRS术后出血量较低,但费用和二期手术概率较高,可综合病情及患者意愿个体化制定上尿路结石的治疗方案.
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of micro channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ret-rograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary calculi
Objective To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of micro channel percu-taneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL)and retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS)in the treatment of 2.0-3.0 cm upper urinary calculi.Methods From February 2018 to October 2021,72 patients with 2.0-3.0 cm upper urinary calculi diagnosed in our hospital were collected retrospectively and divided into two groups:The MPCNL group was given MPCNL,and the RIRS group was given RIRS treatment,with 36 cases in each group.The patient's hospitalization related indicators,the stone clearance rate and serum inflammatory indicators at 1 week,1 month,and 3 months,serum inflammatory markers af-ter surgery[tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-10(IL-10),IL-6,IL-4 and IL-2],visual analogue scale(VAS),renal function(serum creatinine and urea nitrogen),surgery related complica-tions and second-stage surgery were recorded and compared within two groups.Results Compared with the MPCNL group,the intraoperative blood loss,surgery time,hospital stay,creatinine,urea ni-trogen in the RIRS group were reduced,and hospitalization expenses were significantly increased(all P<0.05).Compared with the MPCNL group,the stone clearance rate of the RIRS group was lower at 1 week and 1 month after the surgery(x2=4.126、5.258,all P<0.05).Three days after surgery,compared with the MPCNL group,the TNF-α,IL-6,IL-2 were all increased in the RIRS group,IL-10,IL-4,VAS were all decreased in the RIRS group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in complications between two groups(x2=0.127,P=0.722).Compared with the MPCNL group,the RIRS group had more second-stage surgery(x2=4.235,P=0.040).Conclusions Both MPCNL and RIRS can be used to treat 2.0-3.0 cm upper urinary calculi.But each has advantages and disadvanta-ges.The cost of MPCNL is lower,but the amount of intraoperative blood loss is higher,and the in-flammatory reaction is lower.The postoperative blood loss of RIRS is lower,the inflammatory response is low,but the cost is higher and the probability of second-stage surgery are higher.It is recommended that the treatment plan for upper urinary calculi should be individualized according to the patient's con-dition and willingness.

Urinary CalculiUreteroscopyPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy

刘坤、李亮亮、董安涛、吴亚蒙、黄振宇、邢德福、宋培星

展开 >

安徽医科大学附属阜阳医院泌尿外科,阜阳 236000

尿路结石 输尿管镜检查 经皮肾镜碎石术

2024

国际泌尿系统杂志
中华医学会,湖南省医学会

国际泌尿系统杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.414
ISSN:1673-4416
年,卷(期):2024.44(2)
  • 14