世界临床药物2024,Vol.45Issue(2) :162-170.DOI:10.13683/j.wph.2024.02.009

基于meta分析西黄丸联合化疗治疗乳腺癌的成本-效果评价

Meta-analysis-based cost-effectiveness evaluation of Xihuang pill in combination with chemotherapy for breast cancer

徐海玉 严豪 刘黎明 邱佳瑜 程薇
世界临床药物2024,Vol.45Issue(2) :162-170.DOI:10.13683/j.wph.2024.02.009

基于meta分析西黄丸联合化疗治疗乳腺癌的成本-效果评价

Meta-analysis-based cost-effectiveness evaluation of Xihuang pill in combination with chemotherapy for breast cancer

徐海玉 1严豪 1刘黎明 2邱佳瑜 3程薇4
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 北京中医药大学中医学院,北京 102401
  • 2. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院,北京 100050
  • 3. 北京中医药大学管理学院,北京 102401
  • 4. 北京中医药大学管理学院,北京 102401;北京中医药大学深圳研究院,广东深圳 518118
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 基于meta分析对西黄丸联合化疗治疗乳腺癌的疗效与成本进行成本-效果评价,以期为临床优化卫生资源配置提供参考.方法 以西黄丸+化疗药为试验组,以常规化疗药为对照组.根据Cocharane系统评价,运用RevMan5.4软件对纳入研究进行meta分析,并统计两组的成本,通过比较其疗效及成本差异进行成本-效果和敏感性分析.结果 共纳入7篇随机对照试验文献,根据meta分析结果可知,西黄丸联合化疗药与对照组的有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),相比对照组,其有效率和安全性更高,且复发率低;同时成本-效果分析结果显示,西黄丸联合环磷酰胺+盐酸多柔比星(阿霉素)+氟尿嘧啶(CAF)方案的成本-效果比值为101.07元,西黄丸联合环磷酰胺+表柔比星+氟尿嘧啶(CEF)方案的成本-效果比值为64.54元,均小于对照组比值;且两种方案的增量成本-效果比分别为59.97元和48.13元.表明西黄丸联合CAF方案及CEF方案成本-效果优势较大,而西黄丸联合其他方案成本-效果优势不明显.结论 采用西黄丸联合CAF方案及CEF方案治疗乳腺癌更具经济性,为治疗的优选方案.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and cost of Xihuang pill combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer by cost-effectiveness analysis based on the meta-analysis,and to provide reference for clinical optimization of health resource allocation.Methods Xihuang Pill and chemotherapy were the treatment group,and conventional chemotherapy were the control group.According to the Cocharane system evaluation,RevMan5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis and count the costs of two groups.Cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analysis were performed by comparing the differences in efficacy and costs.Results A total of 7 randomized controlled trials were included in the article.According to the results of meta-analysis,the difference in the effective rate of Xihuang pill combined with chemotherapy compared with the control group was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the clinical effective rate and safety were higher and the recurrence rate was lower compared with the control group.Meanwhile,the results of cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness ratio of Xihuang pill combined with cyclophosphamide+Doxorubicin hydrochloride(Adriamycin)+fluorouracil(CAF)regimen was ¥101.07,and the cost-effectiveness ratio of Xihuang pill combined with cyclophosphamide+Epirubicin+fluorouracil(CEF)regimen was ¥64.54,both of which was lower than that of the control group.And the incremental cost effectiveness ratio values of the two scenarios were ¥59.97 and ¥48.13,respectively,which indicated that the Xihuang pill combined with CAF and CEF regimen had a greater cost-effectiveness advantage.The cost-effectiveness of Xihuang pill combined with other programs was not obvious.Conclusion Xihuang pill combined with CAF and CEF regimen is more economical in the treatment of breast cancer,and is the preferred treatment scheme.

关键词

乳腺癌/西黄丸/成本-效果分析/系统评价/meta分析

Key words

breast cancer/Xihuang pill/cost effectiveness analysis/system evaluation/meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

&&(GZY-GCS-2019-026)

出版年

2024
世界临床药物
上海医药工业研究院

世界临床药物

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.849
ISSN:1672-9188
参考文献量22
段落导航相关论文