首页|"一站式介入"治疗在心房颤动合并冠心病患者中的安全性和有效性研究

"一站式介入"治疗在心房颤动合并冠心病患者中的安全性和有效性研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨"一站式介入"治疗[同期左心耳封堵联合经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗]在心房颤动合并冠心病患者中的安全性和有效性,为临床治疗心房颤动合并冠心病患者提供参考.方法 选取2014年8月-2022年11月于陆军军医大学第一附属医院心血管内科住院的56例房颤合并冠心病患者为研究对象,将同期行左心耳封堵和PCI治疗的17例患者作为一站式介入组,将分期手术的39例患者作为非一站式介入组.收集2组患者的性别、年龄、合并基础疾病等一般资料及经胸心脏超声(TTE)和经食道心脏超声(TEE)等检查结果,随访患者术后缺血性脑卒中、大出血、器械相关血栓(DRT)、心衰再住院等发生情况.结果 2组患者美国纽约心脏病学会(NYHA)心功能分级Ⅲ级所占比例及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=4.016,P=0.045;t=2.305,P=0.025);2组患者年龄、性别构成、吸烟及饮酒比例、合并高血压病比例、合并糖尿病比例、合并外周动脉硬化比例、CHA2DS2-VASc评分、HAS-BLED评分等资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).一站式介入组和非一站式介入组患者左心耳最大宽度分别为(20.76±3.05)mm和(20.49±2.38)mm,左心耳最大深度分别为(27.18±4.98)mm和(27.26±4.58)mm,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.367、0.058,P=0.715、0.954);一站式介入组和非一站式介入组患者植入左心耳封堵器直径分别为(26.65±2.98)mm和(26.54± 3.41)mm,差异无统计学意义(t=0.114,P=0.910);一站式介入组和非一站式介入组患者植入支架数量分别为(1.00± 0.00)个和(1.26±0.55)个,差异有统计学意义(t=2.919,P=0.006);2组患者左心耳封堵术后残余分流发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=1.057,P=0.229).2组患者术前和术后3个月左房(LA)前后径、右房(RA)横径、左室(LV)前后径、右室(RV)前后径和左室射血分数(LVEF)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).2组患者随访终末事件发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.014,P=0.906).2组患者终末事件的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线无统计学差异(P=0.912).结论 "一站式介入"治疗对心房颤动合并冠心病患者是安全和有效的,有一定的临床推广价值.
Safety and efficacy of"One-Stop Intervention"in patients with atrial fibrillation comorbid with coronary heart disease
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of"One-Stop Intervention"treatment[simultaneous left atrial ap-pendage closure combined with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)]in patients with atrial fibrillation comorbid with coronary heart disease,and provide evidence for clinical treatment of these patients.Methods A total of 56 patients with at-rial fibrillation and coronary heart disease admitted to the Department of Cardiology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from August 2014 to November 2022 were selected as the study participants.Among them,17 patients who underwent simultaneous left atrial appendage closure and PCI were assigned to the One-Stop Intervention group,and 39 patients who underwent staged surgery were assigned to the non-One Stop Intervention group.General information such as gender,age,and underlying diseases,as well as examination results of transthoracic echocardiography(TTE)and transesophage-al echocardiography(TEE),were collected for both groups.The occurrence of postoperative ischemic stroke,major bleeding,de-vice-related thrombus(DRT),and heart failure readmission was followed up.Results Significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients with New York Heart Association(NYHA)functional class Ⅲ and LDL-C levels between the two groups(x2=4.016,P=0.045;t=2.305,P=0.025).No significant differences were found in age,gender composition,smoking and drinking rates,proportions of hypertension,diabetes,peripheral arterial disease,CHA2DS2-VASc score,HAS-BLED score,and other data between the two groups(P>0.05).The maximum width of left atrial appendage implantation in the One-Stop Intervention group and the non-One Stop Intervention group was(20.76±3.05)mm and(20.49±2.38)mm,re-spectively,and the maximum depth was(27.18±4.98)mm and(27.26±4.58)mm,respectively,with no significant differences(t=0.367,0.058,P=0.715,0.954).The diameter of the left atrial appendage closure device in the One-Stop Intervention group and the non-One Stop Intervention group was(26.65±2.98)mm and(26.54±3.41)mm,respectively,with no significant difference(t=0.114,P=0.910).The number of stents implanted in the One-Stop Intervention group and the non-One Stop Intervention group was(1.00±0.00)and(1.26±0.55),respectively,with a significant difference(t=2.919,P=0.006).No significant difference was found in the occurrence of residual shunt after left atrial appendage closure between the two groups(x2=1.057,P=0.229).There were no significant differences in the left atrial(LA)an-teroposterior diameter,right atrial(RA)transverse diameter,left ventricular(LV)anteroposterior diameter,right ventric-ular(RV)anteroposterior diameter,and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)before and 3 months after surgery be-tween the two groups(P>).05).There was no significant difference in the occurrence of follow-up terminal events be-tween the two groups(x2=0.014,P=0.906).The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of terminal events in the two groups showed no significant difference(P=0.912).Conclusion The One-Stop Intervention treatment is safe and effective for patients with atrial fibrillation comorbid with coronary heart disease,holding promise for clinical application.

Atrial fibrillationCoronary artery diseaseOne-StopLeft atrial appendage closurePercutaneous coronary intervention

颜文、许祥、万陈、刘锋、姚青、王斌斌、刘力萍、宋玲、宋治远、李华康

展开 >

陆军军医大学第一附属医院心血管内科,重庆 405200

心房颤动 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病 一站式 左心耳封堵 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

重庆市科卫联合医学科研面上项目

2023MSXM146

2024

保健医学研究与实践
西南大学

保健医学研究与实践

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.512
ISSN:1673-873X
年,卷(期):2024.21(2)
  • 23