首页|功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积对腰椎间盘突出症的诊断价值及与椎间盘退变的关系

功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积对腰椎间盘突出症的诊断价值及与椎间盘退变的关系

扫码查看
目的 研究功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积对腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的诊断价值及与椎间盘退变的关系.方法 选取2020年6月-2023年8月,以LDH收治入我院的96名患者为观察组;选取同期行腰椎MRI的50名体检者(无腰椎退行性疾病)作为对照组.根据Pfirrmann分级将观察组L4/L5和 L5/S1层面椎间盘进行分级;使用ImageJ软件测量2组研究对象椎旁肌横截面积、肌肉脂肪化横截面积和椎间盘横截面积,并计算对应层面功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积.比较2组研究对象功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积对LDH的诊断价值;比较不同椎间盘退变程度等级患者对应的功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积;分析椎间盘退变程度等级与功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积的相关性并分析功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积的影响因素.结果 对照组研究对象L5/S1、L4/L5层面功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积均大于观察组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组不同椎间盘退变程度等级患者的功能性相对腰大肌横截面积、功能性相对多裂肌横截面积、功能性相对竖脊肌横截面积差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).相关分析结果显示,在L5/S1平面上,功能性相对腰大肌横截面积、功能性相对多裂肌横截面积、功能性相对竖脊肌横截面积与腰椎间盘退变程度等级的相关系数rs值分别为-0.388、0.344、0.360(P<0.001);在L4/L5平面上,功能性相对腰大肌横截面积、功能性相对多裂肌横截面积、功能性相对竖脊肌横截面积与腰椎间盘退变程度等级的相关系数rs值分别为-0.500、-0.489、0.501(P<0.001).在L5/S1平面,功能性相对腰大肌横截面积、功能性相对多裂肌横截面积、功能性相对竖脊肌横截面积诊断 LDH 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.892(95%CI:0.830~0.937)、0.911(95%CI:0.852~0.951)、0.640(95%CI:0.557~0.718);在L4/L5平面上,功能性相对腰大肌横截面积、功能性相对多裂肌横截面积、功能性相对竖脊肌横截面积诊断 LDH 的 AUC 分别为 0.850(95%CI:0.782~0.904)、0.919(95%CI:0.862~0.958)、0.848(95%CI:0.780~0.902).回归分析结果显示,腰椎间盘退变程度等级是功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积的独立影响因素(P<0.05).结论 功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积对临床LDH的诊断具有重要参考价值,且其与椎间盘退变程度等级存在负相关,同时腰椎间盘的退变是椎旁肌退变的独立影响因素.
Diagnostic value of functional relative cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscles in lumbar disc herniation and the relationship with disc degeneration
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of the functional relative cross-sectional area(CSA)of paraspinal muscles in lumbar disc herniation(LDH)and its relationship with disc degeneration.Methods Ninety-six LDH patients treated at our hospital from June 2020 to August 2023 were selected as the observation group,and 50 individuals without lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent lumbar MRI during the same period were selected as the control group.The observation group's L4/L5 and L5/S1 discs were graded according to the Pfirrmann classification.ImageJ software was used to measure the paraspinal muscle CSA,muscle fat infiltration CSA,and disc CSA in both groups,and the functional relative CSA was calculated.The functional relative CSA of the paraspinal muscles was compared between the two groups.The di-agnostic value of functional relative CSA for LDH was analyzed using ROC curves,and the relationship between disc degen-eration severity and functional relative CSA was analyzed along with the influencing factors.Results The functional relative CSA of the L/S1 and L4/L5 discs in the control group was significantly larger than that in the observation group(P<0.05).Significant differences were found in the functional relative CSA of the psoas major,multifidus,and erector spinae among patients with different disc degeneration grades in the observation group(P<0.05).Correlation analysis showed that at the L5/S1 level,the correlation coefficients(rs)between the functional relative CSA of the psoas major,multifidus,erector spi-nae,and disc degeneration severity were-0.388,-0.344,and-0.360,respectively(P<0.001);at the L4/L5 level,the rs values were-0.500,-0.489,and-0.501(P<0.001).The AUCs for diagnosing LDH using the functional relative CSA of the psoas major,multifidus,and erector spinae at the L5/S1 level were 0.892(95% CI:0.830-0.937),0.911(95% CI:0.852-0.951),and 0.640(95% CI:0.557-0.718),respectively;at the L4/L5 level,the AUCs were 0.850(95% CI:0.782-0.904),0.919(95% CI:0.862-0.958),and 0.848(95% CI:0.780-0.902).Regression analysis showed that disc degeneration severity was an independent influencing factor for functional relative CSA(P<0.05).Conclu-sion Functional relative CSA of the paraspinal muscles has an important reference value for diagnosing LDH and is nega-tively correlated with disc degeneration severity.Disc degeneration is an independent influencing factor for paraspinal muscle degeneration.

Functional relative cross-sectional areaLumbar disc herniationDisc degenerationPfirrmann classification

王崇祥、朱玉珍、王辉、王欢、赵博、于燕

展开 >

西安交通大学第一附属医院疼痛科,西安 710061

西安交通大学医学部公共卫生学院营养与食品安全系,西安 710061

西安交通大学第一附属医院血液内科,西安 710061

功能性相对椎旁肌横截面积 腰椎间盘突出症 椎间盘退化 Pfirrmann分级

陕西省重点研发计划

2020SF-131

2024

保健医学研究与实践
西南大学

保健医学研究与实践

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.512
ISSN:1673-873X
年,卷(期):2024.21(3)
  • 26