首页|2022-2023年《保健医学研究与实践》外审退稿护理论文特征分析

2022-2023年《保健医学研究与实践》外审退稿护理论文特征分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨2022-2023年《保健医学研究与实践》外审退稿护理论文特征,以期为临床护理人员科研工作提供参考,提高护理类论文质量和稿件录用率.方法 本研究选取2022-2023年本刊外审退稿护理论文130篇为研究对象.收集各论文的基本情况,包括第一作者单位所在地区、单位性质[医疗卫生机构(级别、是否为高校附属医院)还是高等学校]、是否有基金项目、第一作者学历、第一作者职称、论文类型、论文合作人数、详细退稿意见.结果 第一作者单位所在省份以河南居首,占52.31%.第一作者单位性质以医疗机构为主,占99.23%.基金项目方面以没有基金项目为主,占80.00%.其中,一级医院占1.55%(2/129),二级医院占11.63%(15/129),三级医院占86.82%(112/129);高校附属医院占27.13%(35/129),非附属医院占72.87%(94/129).第一作者学历以本科为主,占94.61%.第一作者职称以中级为主,占58.46%.论文类型以论著为主,占96.92%.外审退稿论文的退稿原因中占比前3位的依次是缺乏创新性,观察指标选择不恰当或不完整,研究组(干预组均统一命名为研究组)干预方法与对照组雷同或混淆,分别占98.46%、92.31%、84.62%.124篇论著的干预措施主要是针对性护理、预见性护理、集束化护理、延续性护理、人性化护理、多学科协作护理模式、循证护理等,分别占11.29%、6.45%、5.64%、6.44%、4.83%、4.83%、4.03%.120篇论文退稿原因均有观察指标选择不恰当或不完整.归纳具体的退稿原因包括:观察指标和干预措施相互隔离,测评的指标不是干预的内容(92.50%);测评指标意义不大(21.67%);测评指标没有主次(99.17%);测评指标与干预措施因果关系存疑(49.17%);测评指标可行性不强(31.67%);测评指标选择过于简单(19.17%).结论 临床护士的科研素养还有很大的提升空间.尤其需对他们进行选题、观察指标选择、干预方案书写方面的培训.
Characteristics analysis of nursing manuscripts rejected by external review from Health Medicine Research and Practice in 2022-2023
Objective This study aimed to explore the characteristics of nursing manuscripts rejected by external review from Health Medicine Research and Practice in 2022-2023,to provide support for clinical nursing staff's research,and to pro-mote the quality and acceptance rate of nursing manuscripts.Methods The study selected 130 nursing manuscripts rejected by external review from this journal in 2022-2023.The basic information of each manuscript was collected,including the region where the first author's institution is located,the nature of the institution[medical and health institutions(grade lev-el,whether affiliated with a university)or higher education institutions],whether there was a funding project,the first au-thor's educational background,the first author's professional title,the type of manuscript,the number of collaborators,and detailed rejection comments.Results The province with the most first author affiliations was Henan,accounting for 52.31% .The institutions of the first authors were primarily medical institutions,accounting for 99.23% .Regarding fun-ding projects,the majority did not have any,representing 80.00% .Among these,primary hospitals accounted for 1.55% (2/129),secondary hospitals for 11.63% (15/129),and tertiary hospitals for 86.82% (112/129);university-affiliated hos-pitals accounted for 27.13% (35/129),and non-affiliated hospitals for 72.87% (94/129).The first author's education level was predominantly undergraduate,making up 94.61% .The primary professional title of the first authors was intermediate,accounting for 58.46%;the main type of manuscript was research papers,accounting for 96.92% .The top three reasons for manuscript rejection by external review were a lack of innovation,inappropriate or incomplete selection of observation in-dicators,and intervention methods in the study group(all intervention groups were uniformly named study groups)being similar or confused with the control group,accounting for 98.46%,92.31%,and 84.62%,respectively.The main inter-vention measures in 124 research papers were targeted nursing,predictive nursing,bundled nursing,continuing nursing,humanized nursing,multidisciplinary collaborative nursing models,and evidence-based nursing,accounting for 11.29%,6.45%,5.64%,6.45%,4.83%,4.83%,and 4.03%,respectively.The reasons for rejection in 120 papers included inap-propriate or incomplete selection of observation indicators.Specific reasons included:isolation between observation indica-tors and intervention measures,the indicators measured were not the content of the intervention(92.50% );the indicators measured had little significance(21.67% );lack of prioritization among indicators(99.17% );dubious causal relationship between indicators and intervention measures(49.17% );low feasibility of the indicators(31.67% );and overly simplistic selection of indicators(19.17% ).Conclusion The research literacy of clinical nurses needs marked improvement.It is cru-cial to train them in topic selection,observation indicator selection,and intervention plan writing.

NursingManuscript qualityExternal review rejectionResearch literacy

戴丽、李佳、黄文杰、韦晗、胡永国

展开 >

西南大学《保健医学研究与实践》编辑部,重庆 400715

遵义医科大学珠海校区护理学系,广东 珠海 401120

重庆市南川区人民医院麻醉科,重庆 408400

护理 论文质量 外审退稿 科研素养

中国高校科技期刊研究会"善锋软件基金"

CUJS2023-SF016

2024

保健医学研究与实践
西南大学

保健医学研究与实践

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.512
ISSN:1673-873X
年,卷(期):2024.21(3)
  • 11