首页|基于胸痛中心的程序化急诊护理模式在老年急性心肌梗死患者中的应用效果

基于胸痛中心的程序化急诊护理模式在老年急性心肌梗死患者中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨基于胸痛中心(CPC)的程序化急诊护理模式应用在老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中的效果,以期为临床治疗提供参考.方法 选取2020年1月-2021年7月南京医科大学第一附属医院/江苏省人民医院接诊的老年AMI患者作为对照组(n=57);将2021年8月-2023年2月南京医科大学第一附属医院/江苏省人民医院接诊的老年AMI患者作为观察组(n=61).对照组患者采取常规急救护理.观察组患者在常规急救护理基础上采用基于CPC的程序化急诊护理模式干预.比较2组患者抢救效率;急救后4 d,比较2组患者心率(HR)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、每搏量(SV)、左室压力上升最大速率(dp/dt max)、西雅图心绞痛生活质量量表(SAQ)评分、希望量表(HHI)评分;比较2组患者急救后4 d内不良事件发生情况.结果 观察组患者分诊时间、急救时间、急诊球囊扩张时间、住院时间均短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).急救后4 d,观察组患者HR、低于对照组,LVEF、SV、dp/dt max高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).急救后4 d,观察组患者SAQ中躯体受限(PL)、心绞痛状态(AS)、发作频率(AF)、治疗满意度(TS)、疾病认知(DS)评分及总分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).急救后4 d,观察组患者HHI中对未来态度(T)、亲密关系(I)、积极行动(P)评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).2组患者急救后4 d内不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 基于CPC的程序化急诊护理模式应用在老年AMI患者急救中能有效缩短急救时间,提高急诊效率,改善患者心功能,促使其保持积极心态,从而提升患者生活质量,故此护理模式值得推广.
Application of a programmed emergency nursing model based on Chest Pain Center in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction
Objective To explore the effect of a programmed emergency nursing model based on a Chest Pain Center(CPC)in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)and provide references for clinical practice.Methods Elderly AMI patients who were admitted to our hospital,between January 2020 and July 2021 were assigned to the control group(n=57),while those admitted between August 2021 and February 2023 were assigned to the observation group(n=61).Patients in the control group received conventional emergency care,while those in the observation group were managed with a programmed emergency nursing model based on CPC in addition to conventional care.Rescue efficien-cy was compared between the two groups.Four days after the emergency intervention,heart rate(HR),left ventricular e-jection fraction(LVEF),stroke volume(SV),maximum rate of increase in left ventricular pressure(dp/dt max),Seattle Angina Questionnaire(SAQ)scores,and Herth Hope Index(HHI)scores were compared.The incidence of adverse events within four days after emergency intervention was also assessed.Results The observation group showed significantly shor-ter triage time,emergency treatment time,emergency balloon expansion time,and length of hospital stay compared to the control group(P<0.05).Four days after emergency treatment,the observation group had a lower HR and higher LVEF,SV,and dp/dt max than the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The subscale(PL,AS,AF,TS,and DS)and total scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The HHI scores for temporality(T),interconnectedness(I),and positivity(P)dimensions were also significantly higher in the observation group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse events within four days after emergency intervention did not differ significantly between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The programmed emergency nursing model based on CPC effectively shortens emergency response time,improves rescue efficiency,enhances cardiac function,and helps patients maintain a positive mindset,thereby raising their quality of life.This care model is worth promoting in clinical practice.

Programmed emergency care modelChest pain centerElderly myocardial infarction

杨思玥、张丽、黄夕华、张劲松、陈燕子、印佳佳、胡海洋

展开 >

南京医科大学第一附属医院/江苏省人民医院急诊中心,南京 210000

程序化急诊护理模式 胸痛中心 老年心肌梗死

2024

保健医学研究与实践
西南大学

保健医学研究与实践

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.512
ISSN:1673-873X
年,卷(期):2024.21(9)