首页|UBE-PLIF、MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病的效果比较研究

UBE-PLIF、MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病的效果比较研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨单侧双通道内镜技术辅助后路腰椎椎间融合术(UBE-PLIF)、微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗腰椎退变性疾病的效果,以期为临床治疗提供参考.方法 选取2020年8月—2023年12月甘肃省平凉市第二人民医院收治的127例腰椎退变性疾病患者为研究对象.采用随机数字表法,将患者分为对照组(n=63)和观察组(n=64).对照组患者接受MIS-TLIF治疗,观察组患者接受UBE-PLIF治疗.术后6个月时评价2组患者植骨融合情况;比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院时间;比较2组患者术前、术后(3个月、6个月)疼痛数字评分法(NRS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);比较2组患者术后6个月内并发症发生情况.结果 2组患者植骨融合率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组患者手术时间长于对照组,术中出血量、术后引流量均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).术前、术后6个月时,2组患者腰部NRS评分、腿部NRS评分、ODI比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3个月时,观察组患者腰部NRS评分、腿部NRS评分、ODI低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).2组患者并发症发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 UBE-PLIF、MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效相当,但UBE-PLIF具有术中出血量和术后引流量少、术后腰腿部疼痛轻、恢复快的优点,值得临床推广应用.
Comparative study of the efficacy of UBE-PLIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
Objective To explore the effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic-posterior lumbar interbody fusion(UBE-PLIF)and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disea-ses,aiming to provide a reference for clinical treatment.Methods A total of 127 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases admitted to Pingliang Second People's Hospital from August 2020 to December 2023 were selected as the study participants,who were randomly assigned to a control group(n=63)and an observation group(n=64)using a random number table method.Patients in the control group received MIS-TLIF treatment,while those in the observation group UBE-PLIF treat-ment.The bone fusion status of the two groups was evaluated at 6 months postoperatively;the time of operation,intraoper-ative blood loss,postoperative drainage volume,and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.The pain numerical rating scale(NRS)scores and Oswestry disability index(ODI)before and after surgery(3 months,6 months)were compared between the two groups;and the occurrence of complications within 6 months postoperatively was compared between the two groups.Results No significant difference was observed in the fusion rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The time of operation in the observation group was significantly longer than in the control group,while the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were both significantly less than in the control group(P<0.05).Before surgery and at 6 months postoperatively,no significant differences were noted in the lumbar NRS score,leg NRS score,and ODI between the two groups(P>0.05);at 3 months postoperatively,the lumbar NRS score,leg NRS score,and ODI in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).No significant difference was found in the occurrence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical effica-cy of UBE-PLIF is comparable to that of MIS-TLIF in treating lumbar degenerative diseases,but UBE-PLIF has the advan-tages of less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume,lighter postoperative lumbar and leg pain,and fas-ter recovery,which is worth promoting in clinical practice.

Lumbar degenerative diseaseUnilateral biportal endoscopyPosterior lumbar interbody fusionClinical efficacy

鲁永刚、孙董平、张玉辉、马耀华、万子浩、刘雪勇、王举庆

展开 >

甘肃省平凉市第二人民医院骨科,甘肃 平凉 744000

甘肃医学院附属医院骨科,甘肃 平凉 744000

腰椎退变性疾病 单侧双通道内镜技术 后路腰椎椎间融合术 临床疗效

2024

保健医学研究与实践
西南大学

保健医学研究与实践

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.512
ISSN:1673-873X
年,卷(期):2024.21(10)