首页|经椎弓根旁外侧入路与经椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的疗效比较

经椎弓根旁外侧入路与经椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较经椎弓根旁外侧入路与经椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的疗效及术后近期残留腰背部疼痛发生率的差异.方法 纳入自2019-03-2020-05采用经皮椎体成形术治疗的58例新发单节段骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折,其中29例经椎弓根旁外侧入路(椎弓根旁外侧入路组),29例经椎弓根穿刺入路(椎弓根入路组),比较两组手术时间、骨水泥注入量、骨水泥渗漏率,以及术后疼痛VAS评分、术后近期残余腰背痛发生率、术后伤椎后凸角.结果 两组手术时间、骨水泥渗漏率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但椎弓根旁外侧入路组骨水泥灌注量多于椎弓根入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).所有患者均获得随访,随访时间3~12个月,平均6.5个月.两组术后疼痛均有明显缓解,椎弓根旁外侧入路组术后1d、1周疼痛VAS评分比椎弓根入路组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组术后伤椎后凸角均较术前明显改善,但两组术后伤椎后凸角差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组术后近期均有患者残余腰背部疼痛,椎弓根入路组术后1d、术后1周残余腰背部疼痛发生率高于椎弓根旁外侧入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组术后1个月残余腰背部疼痛发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 经椎弓根旁外侧入路与经椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折均能获得满意疗效,但是经椎弓根旁外侧入路术后近期残留腰背痛发生率明显低于经椎弓根入路.
Comparison of efficacy of vertebroplasty via extra-pedicular lateral approach versus pedicular approach for osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures
Objective To compare the efficacy and the incidence of postoperative residual lower back pain between the extra-pedicular lateral approach and the pedicular approach in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar compres-sion fractures.Methods Fifty-eight patients with newly diagnosed single-segment osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty from March 2019 to May 2020 were included.Twenty-nine patients under-went the procedure via the extra-pedicular lateral approach(extra-pedicular lateral approach group)while another 29 via the pedicular approach(pedicular approach group).The two groups were compared in terms of operation time,volume of bone ce-ment injected,bone cement leakage rate,postoperative pain VAS(Visual Analog Scale)scores,incidence of postoperative short-term residual lower back pain,and postoperative vertebral kyphotic angle.Results There was no significant difference in op-eration time and bone cement leakage rate between the two groups(P>0.05).However,the volume of bone cement injected in the extra-pedicular lateral approach group was significantly higher than that in the pedicular approach group(P<0.05).All pa-tients were followed up for 3 to 12 months,with an average of 6.5 months.Postoperative pain was significantly relieved in both groups.The extra-pedicular lateral approach group had significantly lower postoperative day 1 and week 1 pain VAS scores compared to the pedicular approach group(P<0.05).The postoperative vertebral kyphotic angle was significantly improved com-pared to preoperative values in both groups,but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Both groups experienced short-term postoperative residual lower back pain,with the pedicular approach group showing a higher inci-dence of residual lower back pain on postoperative day 1 and week 1 compared to the extra-pedicular lateral approach group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of residual lower back pain at 1 month postoperatively between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Both the extra-pedicular lateral approach and the pedicular approach for vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures can achieve satisfactory outcomes.However,the incidence of short-term postoperative residual lower back pain is significantly lower in the extra-pedicular lateral approach compared to the pe-dicular approach.

Thoracolumbar compression fractureVertebroplastyExtra-pedicular lateral approachPedicular approachOsteo-porosis

王罡、陈勇、杨茂伟、易东升

展开 >

大连市第二人民医院脊柱外科,辽宁 116001

胸腰椎压缩骨折 椎体成形术 椎弓根旁外侧入路 椎弓根入路 骨质疏松性

2024

中国骨与关节损伤杂志
中华预防医学会

中国骨与关节损伤杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.623
ISSN:1672-9935
年,卷(期):2024.39(3)
  • 28