首页|关节镜下骨槽带线锚钉与单骨道解剖重建内侧髌股韧带治疗复发性髌骨脱位的疗效比较

关节镜下骨槽带线锚钉与单骨道解剖重建内侧髌股韧带治疗复发性髌骨脱位的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较关节镜下骨槽带线锚钉与单骨道解剖重建内侧髌股韧带治疗复发性髌骨脱位的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析自2017-01-2021-01采用关节镜下内侧髌股韧带重建术治疗的35例复发性髌骨脱位,其中19例髌骨侧采用单骨道解剖重建(单骨道组),16例髌骨侧采用骨槽带线锚钉固定(带线锚钉组).比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、髌骨侧重建肌腱宽度,术后外侧髌股角、髌骨适合角、膝关节疼痛VAS评分、膝关节Kujala评分、膝关节Lysholm评分.结果 35例均获得随访,随访时间12~16个月,平均13个月.所有患者术后12个月内未出现髌骨再脱位.单骨道组手术时间较带线锚钉组短,术后3、6、9、12个月膝关节Kujala评分、膝关节Lysholm评分高于带线锚钉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组术中出血量、髌骨侧重建肌腱宽度、术后3个月外侧髌股角、术后3个月髌骨适合角,以及术后3、6、9、12个月膝关节疼痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与关节镜下骨槽带线锚钉重建内侧髌股韧带治疗复发性髌骨脱位比较,关节镜下通过单骨道解剖重建内侧髌股韧带治疗复发性髌骨脱位可以缩短手术时间,更有利于患者早期开始进行康复训练,患者的髌骨稳定性及膝关节功能改善更明显.
Comparison of efficacy of arthroscopic bone trough with wire anchors versus anatomical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with a single osseous tract in treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic bone trough osteotomy with wire anchors versus anatom-ical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with a single osseous tract in the treatment of recurrent patellar disloca-tion.Methods Thirty-five patients of recurrent patellar dislocation treated with arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed,of which 19 patellar sides were anatomically reconstructed with a monoskeletal channel(monoskeletal channel group),and 16 patellar sides were fixed by a bone trough with a threaded anchor nail(threaded anchor nail group).Surgical time,intraoperative bleeding,width of the reconstructed tendon on the patellar side,postoperative lateral patellofemoral angle,patellar fit angle,knee pain VAS score,knee Kujala score,and knee Lysholm score were compared between the two groups.Results All 35 cases were followed up for 12 to 16 months,with a mean of 13 months.All patients did not have patellar re-dislocation within 12 months after surgery.The operation time was shorter in the monocostal channel group than in the group with wire anchors,and the knee Kujala scores and knee Lysholm scores were higher than those in the group with wire anchors at 3,6,9,and 12 months postoperatively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The differences in intraoperative bleeding,lateral patellar reconstruction tendon width,lateral patellofemoral angle at 3 months postoperatively,patellar fit angle at 3 months postoperatively,and knee pain VAS scores at 3,6,9,and 12 months postoperatively were not statistically significant between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with arthroscopic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament by bone trough with wire anchors for recurrent patellar dislocation,arthroscopic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament by unipatellar channel dissection for the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation can shorten the operative time,which is more conducive to the early commencement of the pa-tient's rehabilitation,and the patient's improvement of the patellar stability and knee function is more obvious.

Recurrent patellar dislocationMedial patellofemoral ligamentLigament reconstructionMonofemoral tractAn-chor nail with wire

郝非凡、夏磊、胡泽森、付浩然、张旭辉

展开 >

新乡医学院研究生院,河南新乡 453003

中国人民解放军陆军第八十三集团军医院骨科一区,河南新乡 453001

复发性髌骨脱位 内侧髌股韧带 韧带重建 单骨道 带线锚钉

2024

中国骨与关节损伤杂志
中华预防医学会

中国骨与关节损伤杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.623
ISSN:1672-9935
年,卷(期):2024.39(4)
  • 24