生命美学不属于后实践美学
Life Aesthetics Does Not Belong to Post-Practical Aesthetics
潘知常1
作者信息
- 1. 南京大学美学与文化传播研究中心,江苏南京 210093
- 折叠
摘要
本文完全不涉及对于后实践美学(时期、思潮)的任何评价,仅仅是想在学术史上进行澄清:生命美学并不属于后实践美学(时期、思潮).从发表的时间来看,生命美学的文章比后实践美学(时期、思潮)的文章早了 9年,生命美学的专著比后实践美学(时期、思潮)的专著早了 17年.如果要把早于后实践美学(时期、思潮)的生命美学纳入后实践美学(时期、思潮)的麾下,无疑会导致"关公战秦琼"之类的尴尬.学术史的研究,应该尊重发表先后的事实.如果中国当代美学史研究不符合历史原样,就会显得极不严肃.对于中国当代美学史的真实图景而言,这种做法是极不合适的.
Abstract
This paper is not going to make any evaluation of post-practical aesthetics(including its time and trend of thought),but attempts merely to make clear in terms of academic history that life aesthetics does not belong to post-practical aesthetics(time and trend of thought).The publication of articles of life aesthetics is nine years earlier than that of post-practical aesthetics,and 17 years earlier in terms of the publication of books.The attempt of categorizing life aesthetics,which appeared earlier than post-practical aesthetics,into the latter will undoubtedly be a very embar-rassing approach.The fact of the time sequence of publication should be observed in the study of academic history.It will be extremely unacceptable if the study of the history of contemporary Chinese aesthetics distorts historical facts,which is also extremely inappropriate in the establishment of a real picture of the history of contemporary Chinese aesthet-ics.
关键词
生命美学/超越美学/实践美学/后实践美学/新实践美学Key words
life aesthetics/transcendental aesthetics/practical aesthetics/post-practical aesthetics/new practical aes-thetics引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据