首页|工作场所噪声测量标准的研究进展

工作场所噪声测量标准的研究进展

扫码查看
该文采用系统性综述的方法,从工作分析、测量策略及个体测量要求、评价指标、仪器校准与不确定性分析等6个方面入手,对比分析了 12个国家或标准化组织的噪声暴露测量标准或技术规范.结果表明有7个国家要求在测量前识别职业噪声的类型,4个国家在工作分析时定义了相似暴露组;10个国家对个体噪声测量仪麦克风的摆放位置提出了明确要求;是连续噪声的主要评估指标,多数国家采用Lpeak C计权或A计权来评价脉冲噪声水平;除了测量前的声学校准,澳大利亚等4个国家还要求测量结束后的校准,并规定校准偏差.
Research progress of workplace noise measurement standards
In this paper,a systematic review method was used to compare and analyze the noise exposure measurement standards or technical specifications of 12 countries or standardization organizations from six aspects,including work analysis,measurement strategies and individual measurement requirements,evaluation indicators,instrument calibration and uncertainty analysis.The results showed that 7 countries required to identify the type of occupational noise before measurement,and 4 countries defined similar exposure groups in work analysis;10 countries have specific requirements for the placement of the microphone for individual noise meters;LAeq is the main evaluation index of continuous noise,and most countries adopt Lpeak C weighting or A weighting to evaluate the pulse noise level;in addition to the acoustic calibration before measurement,four countries such as Australia also require calibration after the measurement and stipulate calibration deviation.

NoiseWorkplaceMeasurement standardsNoise type

刘海英、李扬、武林杰、李金哲、沈彤、张美辨

展开 >

安徽医科大学公共卫生学院,安徽合肥 230032

中国疾病预防控制中心职业卫生与中毒控制所,北京 100050

噪声 工作场所 测量标准 噪声类型

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助项目"十四五"国家重点研发项目"十四五"国家重点研发项目

IR01DC015990-012022YFC25032002022YFC2503203

2024

工业卫生与职业病
鞍山钢铁集团公司

工业卫生与职业病

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.486
ISSN:1000-7164
年,卷(期):2024.50(5)