首页|表观扩散系数值联合循环肿瘤细胞评估晚期肝癌TACE联合PD-1抑制剂疗效的价值

表观扩散系数值联合循环肿瘤细胞评估晚期肝癌TACE联合PD-1抑制剂疗效的价值

扫码查看
目的 分析表观扩散系数值(ADC)联合循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)评估晚期肝癌经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)抑制剂疗效的价值.方法 纳入2018年7月-2023年7月海安市中医院收治的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者102例,均接受TACE联合PD-1抑制剂治疗.根据治疗2个月后疗效分为有效组和无效组,于治疗前及治疗1个月后,分别检测两组患者的ADC、CTC及治疗前后的差值(△).筛查晚期HCC患者治疗反应性的影响因素,分析△ADC、△CTC对晚期HCC疗效的评估价值.结果 治疗后,102例晚期HCC患者中进展34例(33.33%),68例(66.67%)患者病情稳定或缓解.有效组CNLC分期Ⅳ期、肝功能Child-Pugh分级C级占比低于无效组[CNLC分期Ⅳ期占比分别为 41.2%(28/68)和 73.5%(25/34),Child-Pugh 分级 C 级占比分别为 20.6%(14/68)和 52.9%(18/34)](P<0.05).治疗后,有效组ADC高于无效组[分别为(2.3±0.5)mm2/s和(1.9±0.4)mm2/s],CTC低于无效组[分别为(19.3±2.9)和(34.5±3.8)](P<0.05);有效组△ADC[分别为(0.6±0.2)mm2/s 和(0.3±0.1)mm2/s]、△CTC 显著高于无效组[分别为(20.7±2.5)和(5.2±1.6)](P<0.05).CNLC 分期(OR=3.53,95%CI:1.20~10.31)、Child-Pugh 分级(OR=3.22,95%CI:1.10~9.43)、△ADC(OR=0.28,95%CI:0.09~0.81)、△CTC(OR=0.21,95%CI:0.07~0.61)均是晚期HCC患者治疗反应性的影响因素(P<0.05).△ADC、△CTC单一及联合评估晚期HCC疗效的灵敏度分别为0.62、0.76、0.81,特异度分别为0.81、0.62、0.74,AUC分别为0.71、0.73、0.81.结论 晚期HCC患者治疗前后ADC及CTC变化评价TACE联合PD-1抑制剂的疗效的效能良好.
An analysis on the combination of apparent diffusion coefficient values and circulating tumor cells in evaluating the efficacy of TACE combined with PD-1 inhibitors for treating advanced liver cancer
Objective To analyze the value of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)combined with circulating tumor cells(CTC)in evaluating the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)combined with programmed death receptor-1(PD-1)inhibitors for treating advanced liver cancer.Methods Between July 2018 and July 2023,102 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)admitted to Hai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine who had received TACE combined with PD-1 inhibitors treatment were enrolled in this study.Based on the treatment efficacy after 2 months,the patients were divided into an effective group and an ineffective group.The ADC,CTC,and the difference(△)between the two groups of patients before and after one month of treatment were measured.The influencing factors of treatment responsiveness in patients with advanced HCC were screened,and the evaluation value of △ADC and△CTC for the treatment efficacy were analyzed.Results After treatment,34(33.33%)out of 102 advanced HCC patients progressed,and 68 patients(66.67%)showed stable or remission.The proportion of CNLC stage Ⅳ and Child Pugh grade C in the effective group was lower than that in the ineffective group[(41.2%(28/68)and 73.5%(25/34)in CNLC stageⅣ,and 20.6%(14/68)and 52.9%(18/34)in Child Pugh grade C,respectively)(P<0.05)].After treatment,the effective group had higher ADC than the ineffective group(2.3±0.5)mm2/s and(1.9±0.4)mm2/s,respectively),while the CTC was lower than that of the ineffective group(19.3±2.9 and 34.5±3.8,respectively)(P<0.05);The effective group had significantly higher △ ADC[(0.6±0.2)mm2/s]and △CTC[(0.3±0.1)mm2/s,respectively]compared to the ineffective group(20.7±2.5 and 5.2±1.6,respectively)(P<0.05).CNLC staging(OR=3.53,95%CI:1.20-10.31),Child Pugh grading(OR=3.22,95%CI:1.10-9.43),△ ADC(OR=0.28,95%CI:0.09-0.81),and△CTC(OR=0.21,95%CI:0.07-0.61)are all influencing factors for treatment response in advanced HCC patients(P<0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of single and combined evaluation of efficacy for advanced HCC with △ ADC and△CTC were 0.62,0.76,and 0.81,respectively.The AUC was 0.71,0.73,and 0.81,respectively.Conclusion The efficacy of TACE combined with PD-1 inhibitors in evaluating the changes of ADC and CTC before and after treatment in patients with advanced HCC is good.

Hepatocellular carcinomaLate stageTranscatheter hepatic artery chemoembolizationImmunotherapyApparent diffusion coefficient valueCirculating tumor cell

张宏娟、周恒琛、周建军、黄开红

展开 >

226600 江苏海安市中医院放射科

226600 江苏海安市中医院药剂科

226600 江苏海安市中医院肿瘤科

肝细胞癌 经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞 免疫治疗 表观扩散系数值 循环肿瘤细胞

江苏省高等学校基础科学

21KJA180001

2024

肝脏
上海市医学会

肝脏

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.71
ISSN:1008-1704
年,卷(期):2024.29(6)
  • 2