广州建筑2024,Vol.52Issue(7) :109-115.

自平衡法抗拔与传统法抗拔试验的对比分析

The Contrast Experiment Study of the Pile Self-balancing Static Load Test and the Traditional Pulling-resistant Pile Method

王晓伟 李祥新 许宇星 巫卓伦
广州建筑2024,Vol.52Issue(7) :109-115.

自平衡法抗拔与传统法抗拔试验的对比分析

The Contrast Experiment Study of the Pile Self-balancing Static Load Test and the Traditional Pulling-resistant Pile Method

王晓伟 1李祥新 1许宇星 1巫卓伦1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广州建设工程质量安全检测中心有限公司,广州 510440
  • 折叠

摘要

本文结合工程实际,以分别采用自平衡法和传统法测试的抗拔桩为研究对象,通过沿桩身布置的钢筋计测试不同荷载下对应的桩身应力,揭示自平衡法和传统法抗拔试验中桩体内力分布存在的异同.通过分析得出:自平衡法抗拔测试中桩身轴力沿着深度由下向上逐渐减少,传统法抗拔则是由上向下逐渐减小;自平衡法抗拔测试中侧摩阻力由下往上发挥,传统法抗拔测试中则是由上往下发挥.

Abstract

This paper took engineering projects with reinforcement meter to conduct different pile internal stress,which is revealed the difference of the internal force between the pile self-balancing static load test and the traditional pulling-resistant pile method.It is analyzed that the pile axial force is decreasing from the bottom to the top in the self-balancing static load test.On the contrary,the pile axial force is decreasing from the top to the bottom in the traditional pulling-resistant pile method.Last but not the least,the result shows that the pile side friction transfers from the bottom to the top in the self-balancing static load test whereas it transfers from the top to the bottom in the traditional pulling-resistant pile method.

关键词

抗拔桩/自平衡法/传统法/桩身轴力/桩侧摩阻力

Key words

pulling-resistant pile/traditional method/traditional law/pile axial force/pile side friction

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
广州建筑
广州市建筑科学研究院有限公司

广州建筑

影响因子:0.452
ISSN:1671-2439
段落导航相关论文