首页|旅行社无过错事由与关联制度的冲突及协调——以《旅游法》第67条为中心

旅行社无过错事由与关联制度的冲突及协调——以《旅游法》第67条为中心

扫码查看
《旅游法》第67条整合式立法暗藏归责事由与关联制度的冲突:不可归责于旅行社的事由作为组团社的免责事由与其承担严格责任相冲突;另作为旅游者的解除事由与免责事由则有违法秩序的一致性.为化解该体系冲突,应参考日本与我国台湾地区分解式立法,通过重新解释法律,就不可归责于旅行社的事由与关联制度作体系性协调:解构第70条的严格责任,确立旅行社过错责任为主、严格责任为辅的责任体系,从而化解第67条将通常事变作为旅行社免责事由与其承担严格责任的冲突;对"影响旅游行程的"进行目的性限缩,补充第67条适用的目的性要件,限制旅行社法定解除权的滥用;对第66条因旅游者原因的解除与责任做反面解释,可归责于旅游者的事件,旅游者不得免责与享有解除权,以限缩第67条"旅行社、履行辅助人已尽合理注意义务仍不能避免的事件"的范围.
The Conflict and Corordination between Travel Agency's No-Fault Reasons and the Associated System:Focusing on Article 67 of the Tourism Law
The Article 67 of the"Tourism Law of the People's Republic of China"harbors conflicts between the integrated legislative attribution of responsibility and associated systems:the causes not attributable to the travel agency as an exemp-tion for the tour organizer conflicts with its strict liability;additionally,the reasons for the traveler's termination and ex-emption violate the consistency of the legal order.To resolve these systemic conflicts,it is necessary to refer to the decom-posed legislation of Japan and the Taiwan region of China,and to achieve systematic coordination of the causes not attribut-able to the travel agency and related systems through re-interpretation of the law:deconstruct the strict liability stipulated in Article 70 of the"Tourism Law of the People's Republic of China",and establish a liability system where the travel a-gency's fault liability is the primary consideration and strict liability is secondary,thereby resolving the conflict between Ar-ticle 67's use of usual incidents as a reason for the travel agency to be exempt from liability and the travel agency's assump-tion of strict liability;by purposefully narrowing the scope of"affecting the travel itinerary",supplement the purposive con-ditions for the application of Article 67 of the"Tourism Law of the People's Republic of China",to restrict the misuse of the statutory rights to terminate of the travel agency;interpret the termination and liability due to the traveler's reasons in Article 66 of the"Tourism Law of the People's Republic of China"in a reverse manner,such that events attributable to the traveler cannot be exempted and the traveler does not have the right to terminate,thereby limiting the scope of"events that the travel agency and the service provider cannot avoid even with reasonable attention"as mentioned in Article 67 of the"Tourism Law of the People's Republic of China".

principle of attribution of responsibilitythe elements of the right to terminatereasons for exemption from liabilitytravel agenciestourists

陈珊、禹路兵

展开 >

西华大学 法学与社会学学院,四川 成都 610039

西南财经大学 法学院,四川 成都 611130

归责原则 解除权要件 免责事由 旅行社 旅游者

国家社科基金项目

20BRK032

2024

贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)
贵州师范大学

贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.261
ISSN:1001-733X
年,卷(期):2024.(5)