首页|特瑞普利单抗辅助FOLFOX治疗对进展期胃癌患者血管新生和PD-1/PD-L1信号通路的影响

特瑞普利单抗辅助FOLFOX治疗对进展期胃癌患者血管新生和PD-1/PD-L1信号通路的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨特瑞普利单抗联合FOLFOX方案治疗进展期胃癌的效果及其免疫调节机制。方法 选取2021年6月至2023年6月驻马店市中心医院收治的97例进展期胃癌患者纳入研究,按随机数表法分为观察组49例和对照组48例,其中对照组采用FOLFOX方案治疗者,观察组采用FOLFOX方案+特瑞普利单抗治疗,21 d为一个疗程,持续治疗6个疗程。比较两组患者治疗6个疗程后的治疗效果,以及治疗前、治疗3个疗程和6个疗程后的程序性细胞死亡受体-1(PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体-1(PD-L1)信号通路(PD-1蛋白、PD-1 mRNA、PD-L1蛋白、PD-L1 mRNA)、血管新生指标[低氧诱导因子1α(HIF-1α)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、促血管生成素-2(Ang-2)、环氧合酶-2(COX-2)],同时比较两组患者治疗期间的毒副反应以及随访6个月的生存率。结果 治疗6个疗程后,观察组患者的疾病控制率为63。27%,明显高于对照组的41。67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗3个疗程、6个疗程后,观察组患者的PD-1蛋白分别为5。83±1。12、5。77±1。26,明显低于对照组的6。84±1。25、7。11±1。36,PD-1 mRNA分别为6。12±1。33、6。01±1。34,明显低于对照组的6。91±1。34、7。20±1。30,PD-L1蛋白分别为6。30±1。05、6。19±1。11,明显低于对照组的7。02±1。33、6。88±1。40,PD-1 mRNA分别为6。41±1。24、6。33±1。25,明显低于对照组的7。19±1。36、7。10±1。38,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗3个疗程、6个疗程后,观察组患者的VEGF分别为(224。46±25。25)ng/mL、(150。10±14。14)ng/mL,明显低于对照组的(279。79±30。44)ng/mL、(191。65±16。63)ng/mL,HIF-1α分别为(135。51±16。67)μg/L、(100。10±12。28)μg/L,明显低于对照组的(175。53±18。48)μg/L、(153。53±14。88)μg/L,Ang-2分别为(68。98±7。36)ng/mL、(46。68±5。13)ng/mL,明显低于对照组的(75。51±7。95)ng/mL、(56。64±6。11)ng/mL,COX-2分别为(31。48±4。12)ng/mL、(20。24±3。38)ng/mL,明显低于对照组的(36。64±4。20)ng/mL、(25。74±3。59)ng/mL;差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。两组患者治疗6个疗程后的毒副反应发生率与随访期间生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 特瑞普利单抗联合FOLFOX方案治疗进展期胃癌,可阻断PD-1/PD-L1信号通路,增强肿瘤控制效果,且具有较好的安全性。
Effect of FOLFOX regimen plus toripalimab on angiogenesis and the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Objective To investigate the efficacy and immunomodulatory mechanism of toripalimab combined with FOLFOX in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.Methods A total of 97 patients with advanced gastric can-cer admitted to Zhumadian Central Hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups according to random number table method.Among them,48 cases treated with FOLFOX regimen were included in the control group,and 49 cases treated with the FOLFOX regimen plus toripalimab were included in the observation group.One treatment cycle was defined as 21 days,with treatments continuing for six cycles.Therapeutic effects after six treatment cycles were compared between the two groups,alongside the programmed cell death receptor-1(PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1)pathway markers(PD-1 protein,PD-1 mRNA,PD-L1 protein,PD-L1 mRNA)and angiogenesis indicators(hypoxia-inducible factor 1α[HIF-1α],vascular endothelial growth factor[VEGF],angiopoietin-2[Ang-2],and cyclooxygenase-2[COX-2])before treatment,after three cycles,and after six cycles.Addi-tionally,the toxic side effects during treatment and the six-month follow-up survival rates were compared between the two groups.Results After 6 treatment cycles,the disease control rate in the observation group was 63.27%,signifi-cantly higher than 41.67%in the control group,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).After 3 and 6 treat-ment cycles,the PD-1 protein levels in the observation group were 5.83±1.12 and 5.77±1.26,respectively,which were lower than corresponding 6.84±1.25 and 7.11±1.36 in the control group;the PD-1 mRNA levels were 6.12±1.33 and 6.01±1.34,respectively,significantly lower than corresponding 6.91±1.34 and 7.20±1.30 in the control group;the PD-L1 protein levels were 6.30±1.05 and 6.19±1.11,respectively,significantly lower than corresponding 7.02±1.33 and 6.88±1.40 in the control group;the PD-1 mRNA levels were 6.41±1.24 and 6.33±1.25,respectively,significantly lower than corresponding 7.19±1.36 and 7.10±1.38 in the control group;the aboved differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Regarding angiogenesis indices,after 3 and 6 treatment cycles,the levels of VEGF were(224.46±25.25)ng/mL and(150.10±14.14)ng/mL,respectively,significantly lower than corresponding(279.79±30.44)ng/mL and(191.65±16.63)ng/mL in the control group;the levels of HIF-1α were(135.51±16.67)μg/L and(100.10±12.28)μg/L,respective-ly,significantly lower than corresponding(175.53±18.48)μg/L and(153.53±14.88)μg/L in the control group;the levels of Ang-2 were(68.98±7.36)ng/mL and(46.68±5.13)ng/mL,respectively,significantly lower than corresponding(75.51±7.95)ng/mL and(56.64±6.11)ng/mL in the control group;the levels of COX-2 were(31.48±4.12)ng/mL and(20.24±3.38)ng/mL,respectively,significantly were lower than corresponding(36.64±4.20)ng/mL and(25.74±3.59)ng/mL in the control group;all the aboved differences statistically significant(P<0.05).No significant differences were ob-served between the two groups in the incidence of toxic side effects after six treatment cycles or in six-month follow-up survival rates(P>0.05).Conclusion The combination of toripalimab and FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of ad-vanced gastric cancer can effectively block the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway,enhance tumor control effect,and exhib-it a favorable safety profile.

Advanced gastric cancerFOLFOX regimenToripalimabProgrammed cell death receptor-1Pro-grammed cell death ligand-1Disease control effectivenessToxic side effects

李楠、陈新宇、秋玉珍、李琦

展开 >

驻马店市中心医院肿瘤内二科,河南 驻马店 463000

进展期胃癌 FOLFOX方案 特瑞普利单抗 程序性细胞死亡受体-1 程序性细胞死亡配体-1 疾病控制效果 毒副反应

2025

海南医学
海南省医学会

海南医学

影响因子:1.158
ISSN:1003-6350
年,卷(期):2025.36(1)