首页|经皮内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和安全性研究

经皮内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和安全性研究

扫码查看
目的 比较经皮内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压(UE-ULBD)手术与后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床疗效和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2021年3月至2023年3月在河南省洛阳正骨医院手术治疗的74例LSS患者的临床资料。依据手术方式的不同分为UE-ULBD组43例和PLIF组31例。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后24h引流量、住院周期和术前、术后第1天、术后3个月和术后1年的腰腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);比较两组患者的术后并发症发生情况。结果 UE-ULBD组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后24h引流量、住院时间分别为(71。75±11。23)min、(47。35±3。31)mL、(58。31±6。31)mL及(5。57±1。25)d,明显短(少)于PLIF组的(119。45±18。760)min、(249。85±11。03)mL、(104。65±11。37)mL、(10。34±1。53)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);UE-ULBD组患者术后第1天、3个月、1年的腰腿疼VAS评分和ODI评分明显低于PILF组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);UE-ULBD组患者的并发症总发生率为4。65%,明显低于PLIF组的19。35%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 UE-ULBD具有创伤少、手术时间短、恢复速度快等优点,且安全性较高,是治疗LSS的有效手术方法。
Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous uniportal endoscopic unilat-eral laminotomy for bilateral decompression(UE-ULBD)with posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)for treating lum-bar spinal stenosis(LSS).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 74 patients who re-ceived surgical treatment for LSS in Luoyang Orthopaedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province from March 2021 to March 2023.According to the different surgical methods,the patients were divided into the UES-ULBD group:(43 cases)and the PLIF group(31 cases).Surgical time,intraoperative bleeding,24-hour postoperative drainage,hospi-tal stay,and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)scores for lumbar pain before and after 1 day,3 months,and 1 year of operation were compared between the two groups.The overall incidence of postoperative complications was also compared between the two groups.Results In the UE-ULBD group,the operative time,intraop-erative blood loss,24-hour postoperative drainage volume,and hospital stay were(71.75±11.23)min,(47.35±3.31)mL,(58.31±6.31)mL,and(5.57±1.25)days,respectively,which were significantly shorter(less)than corresponding(119.45±18.760)min,(249.85±11.03)mL,(104.65±11.37)mL,(10.34±1.53)days in the PLIF group,and the differences were sta-tistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS and ODI scores for lumbar and leg pain in the UE-ULBD group were significant-ly lower than those in the PLIF group at 1 day,3 months,and 1 year postoperatively,with statistically significant differenc-es(P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the UUE-ULBD group was 4.65%,significantly lower than 19.35%in the PLIF group(P<0.05).Conclusion UE-ULBD offers the advantages of minimal invasiveness,short-er operation time,faster recovery,and higher safety,making it an effective surgical method for treating LSS.

SpineLumbar spinal stenosisLumbar decompressionUnilateral laminotomy for bilateral decom-pressionPosterior lumbar interbody fusionClinical efficacySafety

桑亮、刘世敬、李俊辉、申晟

展开 >

河南省洛阳正骨医院(河南省骨科医院)脊柱外三科,河南 郑州 450006

脊柱 腰椎管狭窄症 腰椎管减压 单侧椎板切开双侧减压术 后路腰椎椎体间融合术 疗效 安全性

2025

海南医学
海南省医学会

海南医学

影响因子:1.158
ISSN:1003-6350
年,卷(期):2025.36(1)