首页|常识主义刑法解释观的学理诠释与实践面向

常识主义刑法解释观的学理诠释与实践面向

扫码查看
近年来的刑法教义学研究存在"去经验化"的危险倾向,而常识主义刑法解释观的提出正是对深陷规范"泥潭"的教义学的补偏救弊.当前理论上对常识主义刑法解释观的批判建立在错误理解之上,因而不能成立."将常识判断寓于法律解释"不仅是罪刑法定原则的应有之义,也契合解释过程中的主、客观互构关系,更是满足了法教义学面向功能主义发展的内在要求.合法性、合理性及合目的性构成了常识主义刑法解释观在方法论意义上的三个实践向度,即要求解释结论不得超越实定法的有效范畴;从刑法文本到案件事实的涵摄过程不得悖离基本的逻辑要求;对条文的解释应当符合规范目的,并满足社会公众的合理期待.
Theoretical Interpretation and Practical Orientation of Common-Sense Criminal Law Interpretation
There is a dangerous tendency of"de-empiricism"in the study of criminal doctrine in recent years.Common-sense criminal law interpretation is just to remedy the disadvantages of the criminal doctrine that is limited to normative research.The current theoretical criticism of the common-sense criminal law interpretation is based on wrong understanding and cannot be established."Putting common sense judgment in legal interpretation"is not only the real meaning of the principle of legality,but also conforms to the subjective and objective mutual-construction relationship in the process of interpretation,and it also meets the internal requirements of the development of legal doctrine towards functionalism.Legitimacy,rationality and purposiveness constitute the three practical dimensions of the common-sense criminal law interpretation in the sense of methodology.Therefore,the interpretation conclusion should not exceed the effective scope of the substantive law;the process from the criminal law text to the facts of the case must not deviate from the basic logical requirements;the interpretation of the legal articles should conform to the purpose of the norms and meet the reasonable expectations of the public.

common-sense criminal law interpretationlegal interpretationpublic identificationcommon-sense judg-ment

钱日彤

展开 >

南开大学 法学院,天津 300350

常识主义刑法解释观 法律解释 公众认同 常识判断

2024

河北工业大学学报(社会科学版)
河北工业大学

河北工业大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.603
ISSN:1674-7356
年,卷(期):2024.16(3)