首页|前列腺健康指数对PI-RADS-3病变前列腺癌的诊断价值

前列腺健康指数对PI-RADS-3病变前列腺癌的诊断价值

Value of prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer with PI-RADS-3 lesions

扫码查看
目的 探讨前列腺健康指数(prostate health index,PHI)及其衍生指标在前列腺多参数核磁中PI-RADS-3病变的前列腺癌中的诊断价值.方法 回顾性分析石家庄市人民医院 2019 至 2022 年 204 例前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测值异常病并行超声引导下前列腺活检的患者数据,将 155 例良性前列腺增生的患者作为良性前列腺增生组,49 例前列腺癌患者作为前列腺癌组.收集 2 组患者临床数据,利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价不同亚组中总前列腺特异性抗原(TPSA)、游离/总前列腺特异性抗原(%fPSA)、PHI、前列腺健康指数密度(PHID)和总前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)对于前列腺癌的诊断价值.结果 49 例患有前列腺癌中 81.63%的病例诊断为临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa).2 组年龄、前列腺体积(PV)、TPSA和PSAD差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).前 2 肽前列腺特异性抗原(p2PSA)、PHI和PHID比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).与TPSA相比,PHI(AUC = 0.786,95%CI:0.705~0.867)和PHID(AUC = 0.763,95%CI:0.684~0.843)是前列腺癌更好的预测指标.TPSA、%fPSA、p2PSA、PHI、PHID和PSAD区域在csPCa组的ROC曲线面积分别为 0.587、0.650、0.696、0.823、0.796 和 0.614.所有参数中PHI和PHID对于前列腺癌的预测结果最准确.结论 在PI-RADS-3病变的情况下,相较于传统指标,前列腺健康指数及其衍生指标为前列腺癌的检出提供了最佳的诊断价值.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the prostate health index(PHI)and its derivatives in prostate cancer with the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System(PI-RADS)category 3 lesions.Methods Clinical data of 204 patients with abnormal findings in the prostate-specific antigen(PSA)detection and examined by ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Shijiazhuang People's Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.A total of 155 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were included in the benign prostatic hyperplasia group,and 49 patients with prostate cancer were included in the prostate cancer group.Clinical data of 2 groups of patients were collected,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic potentials of the total prostate-specific antigen(TPSA),free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio(%fPSA),PHI,prostate health index density(PHID)and total prostate-specific antigen density(PSAD)in prostate cancer.Results Among 49 patients with prostate cancer,81.63%were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer(csPca).There were no significant differences in the age,prostate volume(PV),TPSA and PSAD between groups(P>0.05).Significant differences in the pro-2 peptide prostate-specific antigen(p2PSA),PHI and PHID were detected(P<0.05).Compared with that of TPSA,PHI(area under the curve[AUC]=0.786,95%CI 0.705,0.867)and PHID(AUC=0.763,95%CI0.684,0.843)were better predictors of prostate cancer.The AUC of TPSA,%fPSA,p2PSA,PHI,PHID and PSAD regions in the csPCa group was 0.587,0.650,0.696,0.823,0.796 and 0.614,respectively.Among all parameters,PHI and PHID were the most accurate predictive factors for prostate cancer.Conclusion In the case of PI-RADS-3 lesions,the prostate health index and its derivative indicators provide the best diagnostic value for the detection of prostate cancer than those of conventional indicators.

prostate cancerprostate health indexpre-2 peptide prostate specific antigenmultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingretrospective studies

崔杨、赵晋、孙远

展开 >

050000 河北省石家庄市人民医院泌尿外科

河北省人民医院输血科

050000 河北省石家庄市人民医院手术室

前列腺癌 前列腺健康指数 前2肽前列腺特异性抗原 多参数磁共振成像 回顾性研究

石家庄市科技计划项目

201461013

2024

河北医药
河北省医学情报研究所

河北医药

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.075
ISSN:1002-7386
年,卷(期):2024.46(2)
  • 18