人类世的"美好"与"末世"之争:分歧、实质与回应
The Debate on the the "Great" and "Apocalyptic" Aspects of the Anthropocene:Differences,Essence and Responses
孟天昊 1刘魁1
作者信息
- 1. 东南大学 马克思主义学院,南京 211189
- 折叠
摘要
作为在理性启蒙运动和现代化进程中形成的社会运行图式,强调个体主体性意识、技术理性、资本逻辑以及社会历史宏大叙事的西方现代性隐含着人与人、人与自然的内在张力,而人类世境遇则表现为西方现代性的逻辑延伸和极化状态.鉴于此,面对西方现代性的人类世困境,生态现代主义和生态末日主义围绕着危机的根源、走向以及拯救方案展开了持续性争议.但是,双方都未能挖掘出困境背后的西方现代性原罪,并且各自的拯救方案也未能挣脱西方现代性的羁绊.因此,中国式现代化基于对"西方现代性神话"的反思和超越,提出了全球性生态危机治理的中国方案,从而让人类得以展望一种兼具反思性、建设性、开放性和全球性的全新世界图景.
Abstract
As a social framework that emerged during the rational Enlightenment and the process of mod-ernization,Western modernity emphasises individual subjectivity,technological rationality,the logic of capital and the grand narrative of social history.However,Western modernity inherently contains tensions between hu-mans and humans,as well as humans and nature.The Anthropocene is a logical extension and polarized state of Western modernity.In light of this,ecological modernism and ecological apocalypticism have sparked ongo-ing controversy regarding the origins,trajectory,and the solution to the crisis within the Anthropocene dilem-ma of Western modernity.However,both sides have failed to uncover the original sin of Western modernity be-hind the predicament,and their respective solutions have not been able to escape the constraints of Western modernity.Therefore,Chinese-style modernity,based on reflection and transcendence of the"myth of West-ern modernity",proposes a Chinese solution for global ecological crisis governance.This allows humanity to envision a new world panorama that is reflective,constructive,open and global.
关键词
人类世境遇/西方现代性/生态现代主义/生态末日主义/中国式现代化/生态危机治理Key words
anthropocene situation/western modernity/ecological modernism/ecological apocalypticism/Chinese-style modernization/ecological crisis management引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据