哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.26Issue(5) :137-144.

土地"三权分置"改革与农民共同富裕——基于马克思"生产-分配"模型的解释

The"Three Rights Separation"Reform of Land and Common Prosperity of Farmers—An Explanation Based on Marx's"Production-Distribution"model

丘斌 李鹏
哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.26Issue(5) :137-144.

土地"三权分置"改革与农民共同富裕——基于马克思"生产-分配"模型的解释

The"Three Rights Separation"Reform of Land and Common Prosperity of Farmers—An Explanation Based on Marx's"Production-Distribution"model

丘斌 1李鹏2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 佛山大学 马克思主义学院,广东 佛山 528000
  • 2. 中共中央党校<国家行政学院>经济学教研部,北京 100091
  • 折叠

摘要

土地"三权分置"改革对于促进农民共同富裕有重要影响.唯物史观反对抛开具体的生产方式抽象地谈论公平的分配,在社会主义市场经济下推进共同富裕要求遵循等价交换规律,中国农业中的小生产方式阻碍这一规律的实现,"三权分置"改革为农村生产方式的转变和共同富裕创造了制度条件.马克思"生产-分配"模型可以很好地揭示小农生产向规模化生产发展时分配关系的变化,在坚持土地集体所有权和稳定承包权的条件下,进一步推动和完善土地经营权流转,对于缩小城乡差距、促进农村社会公平正义和农民共同富裕具有重要意义.

Abstract

The Three Rights Separation reform of farmland has a significant impact on promoting farme's common prosperity.The materialist view of history opposes discussing equitable distribution in an abstract man-ner without considering specific production methods.Promoting common prosperity under a socialist market economy requires adherence to the law of equivalent exchange.The small-scale production methods in China's agriculture hinders the realization of this law.Marx's Production-Distribution model effectively reveals the changes in distribution relationships when small-scale farmers'production evolves into large-scale production.Under the premise of maintaining collective land ownership and stable contracting rights,further promoting and improving the transfer of land operation rights is of great significance for narrowing the urban-rural gap,pro-moting social fairness and justice in rural areas,and achieving common prosperity of farmers.

关键词

"三权分置"/生产方式/分配方式/共同富裕

Key words

three rithts separation/production methods/distribution methods/common prosperity

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)
哈尔滨工业大学

哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.736
ISSN:1009-1971
段落导航相关论文