首页|超声引导下区域阻滞联合全身麻醉对高龄股骨骨折患者凝血功能、血流动力学及术后康复的影响

超声引导下区域阻滞联合全身麻醉对高龄股骨骨折患者凝血功能、血流动力学及术后康复的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨超声引导下区域阻滞联合全身麻醉对高龄股骨骨折患者凝血功能、血流动力学及术后康复的影响.方法 前瞻性选择70 例高龄股骨骨折患者作为研究对象,时间为 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 6月.采用随机数字表法,将患者随机分为治疗A组和治疗B组,每组各 35 例.治疗A组予以静息复合全身麻醉,治疗B组则予以全身麻醉联合超声引导下区域阻滞.观察并比较纳入患者的血流动力学指标、氧化应激反应指标、临床指标、VAS评分、凝血功能指标以及不良反应.结果 两组患者在T0 时期的血流动力学指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在T1、T2、T3、T4 时期治疗B组的血流动力学指标值均显著低于治疗A组(P<0.05);两组患者在T1 时期的氧化应激指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在T2、T3、T4、T5 时期治疗B组的CRP、COR指标值均显著低于治疗A组(P<0.05);同时,治疗B组在T2、T3 时期的NE指标明显高于治疗A组(P<0.05),而在T4、T5 时期则明显低于治疗A组(P<0.05);干预后治疗B组患者的麻醉药用量、苏醒时长、拔除喉罩时长以及术后住院时长等临床指标明显优于治疗A组(P<0.05);术后12h两组患者的PT、APPT指标均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而术后 12h治疗B组患者Fbg指标则明显低于治疗A组(P<0.05);术后 1、6、12 以及 24h治疗B组患者的VAS评分均显著低于治疗A组(P<0.05);两组纳入患者在治疗时均无严重不良反应,治疗方案的安全性较为良好,且干预后治疗B组的不良反应发生率显著低于治疗A组(P<0.05).结论 应用超声引导下区域阻滞联合全身麻醉治疗高龄股骨骨折患者的临床疗效显著,不仅可有效改善患者的氧化应激反应指标、临床指标以及凝血功能指标,还可减轻其VAS评分,稳定血流动力学指标,不良反应少,值得临床推广.
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Regional Block Combined with General Anesthesia on Coagulation Function,Hemodynamics and Postoperative Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Femoral Fracture
Objective To investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided regional block combined with general anesthesia on coagulation function,hemodynamics and postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients with femoral fracture.Method A total of 70 elderly patients with femoral fractures were prospectively selected as the study subjects.Using random number table method,these patients were randomly divided into treatment group A and treatment group B,35 cases in each group.The treatment group A was given resting combined general anesthesia,while the treatment group B was given general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided regional block.The hemodynamic indexes,oxidative stress response indexes,clinical indexes,VAS scores,coagulation function indexes and adverse reactions were observed and compared.Results There was no significant difference in hemodynamic indexes between the two groups at T0(P>0.05),while the hemodynamic indexes of treatment group B at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly lower than those of treatment group A(P<0.05),while the CRP and COR indexes of treatment group B at T2,T3,T4 and T5 were significantly lower than those of treatment group A(P<0.05).At the same time,the NE index in the treatment group B was significantly higher than that in the treatment group A at T2 and T3(P<0.05),while it was significantly lower than that in the treatment group A at T4 and T5(P<0.05).After intervention,the clinical indexes such as anesthetic dosage,recovery time,laryngeal mask removal time and postoperative hospitalization time in the treatment group B were significantly better than those in the treatment group A(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in PT and APPT between the two groups at 12h after operation(P>0.05),while the Fbg index of treatment group B was significantly lower than that of treatment group A at 12h after operation(P<0.05).The VAS scores of the treatment group B at 1h,6h,12h and 24h after operation were significantly lower than those of the treatment group A(P<0.05).There were no serious adverse reactions in the two groups during the treatment,and the safety of the treatment plan was relatively good.After the intervention,the incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group B was significantly lower than that in the treatment group A(P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of ultrasound-guided regional block combined with general anesthesia in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral fracture is significant.It can not only effectively improve the oxidative stress response index,clinical index and coagulation function index of patients,but also reduce the VAS score,stabilize the hemodynamic index,and have fewer adverse reactions.It is worthy of clinical promotion.

Ultrasoundgeneral anesthesiaelderly femoral fracturecoagulation functionhemodynamicsrehabilitation effect

王耀堂、王静

展开 >

河南科技大学第一附属医院麻醉科,河南 洛阳 471000

河南科技大学第一附属医院疼痛科,河南 洛阳 471000

超声 全身麻醉 高龄股骨骨折 凝血功能 血流动力学 康复效果

2024

哈尔滨医药
哈尔滨市医学会

哈尔滨医药

影响因子:0.697
ISSN:1001-8131
年,卷(期):2024.44(6)