黑河学院学报2024,Vol.15Issue(7) :42-45.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9499.2024.07.011

民法典中债务加入与连带责任保证的区分及适用标准

The Distinction and Applicable Standard of Debt Joining and Joint and Several Liability Guarantee in the Civil Code

金丽 王艾春
黑河学院学报2024,Vol.15Issue(7) :42-45.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9499.2024.07.011

民法典中债务加入与连带责任保证的区分及适用标准

The Distinction and Applicable Standard of Debt Joining and Joint and Several Liability Guarantee in the Civil Code

金丽 1王艾春2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 安徽文达信息工程学院 马克思主义学院,安徽 合肥 230000
  • 2. 中电博微电子科技有限公司,安徽 合肥 230000
  • 折叠

摘要

关于债务加入制度,我国《民法典》首次在法律上予以明确,弥补了债法制度上的立法不足,但由于该制度与连带责任保证具有盖然的相似性且在实践中存在第三人做出的意思表示模糊不清,从而给法律适用带来极大的困难.因此,在对二者联系与区分进行分析的前提下,对第三人的意思表示进行详细的制度解释,在穷极意思表示解释的前提下,适用"存疑推定为担保"的标准,从而实现对二者的有效区分.

Abstract

With regard to the system of debt joining,the Civil Code of China has made it clear for the first time in law,which makes up for the legislative deficiencies in the system of debt law.However,great difficulties have been brought to the application of the law due to the similarity between the system and joint and several liability guarantee,together with the ambiguity of the third party's intention in practice.Therefore,this paper analyzes the relationship and distinction between the two,explains in detail the third party's declaration of intention,and puts forward the standard of presumption of doubt as guarantee should be applied on the premise of extreme interpretation of declaration of intention,so as to realize the effective distinction between the two.

关键词

民法典/债务加入/连带责任保证/意思自治/存疑推定

Key words

Civil Code of the PRC/debt accession/joint and several liability guarantee/autonomy of will/presumption of doubt

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

安徽省科重点科研项目(2023AH052813)

安徽省优秀青年教师培育项目(YQYB2023081)

安徽省省级一般项目(2022jyxm624)

安徽文达信息工程学院校级三全育人一般项目(SQYR2023B01)

安徽文达信息工程学院校级一般项目(SQYR2023B04)

出版年

2024
黑河学院学报
黑河学院

黑河学院学报

影响因子:0.169
ISSN:1674-9499
段落导航相关论文