学术期刊"三审制"视域下各责任主体伦理困境成因及破解路径
Causes and Solutions of Each Responsible Subject's Ethical Dilemma from the Perspective of"Three-Review System"of Academic Journals
赵春1
作者信息
- 1. 《常熟理工学院学报》编辑部,江苏 常熟 215500
- 折叠
摘要
"编辑初审、专家复审、主编终审"是学术期刊"三审制"的基本规定程序,每个环节的责任主体均面临一定的伦理困境,即初审编辑对稿件及作者的心里异化,复审专家在决定权方面的异化,终审专家在政治、人性方面的异化等.异化的成因复杂,主体伦理及学术导向均占有相当比例,应加强编辑自律与他律,实现期刊的规范性.
Abstract
The basic procedures regarding the"three-review system"for academic journals involves"first review by editors,re-review by experts and final review by chief editors".The responsible subject of each link faces certain ethical dilemmas,that is,the psychological alienation of the first-review editor to the manuscript and the author,the alienation of the re-review expert in the decision-making power,and the alienation of the final-review expert in politics and human nature.The causes of alienation are complex in terms of subject ethics and academic orientation,so we should strengthen editorial self-discipline and heteronomy to realize the standardization of journals.
关键词
学术期刊/三审制/伦理困境Key words
academic journals/three-review system/ethical dilemma引用本文复制引用
基金项目
全国高等学校文科学报研究会2021年度编辑学课题(PY2021056)
江苏省期刊协会2021年度期刊出版研究课题(2021JSQKB02)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据