首页|学术期刊"三审制"视域下各责任主体伦理困境成因及破解路径

学术期刊"三审制"视域下各责任主体伦理困境成因及破解路径

扫码查看
"编辑初审、专家复审、主编终审"是学术期刊"三审制"的基本规定程序,每个环节的责任主体均面临一定的伦理困境,即初审编辑对稿件及作者的心里异化,复审专家在决定权方面的异化,终审专家在政治、人性方面的异化等。异化的成因复杂,主体伦理及学术导向均占有相当比例,应加强编辑自律与他律,实现期刊的规范性。
Causes and Solutions of Each Responsible Subject's Ethical Dilemma from the Perspective of"Three-Review System"of Academic Journals
The basic procedures regarding the"three-review system"for academic journals involves"first review by editors,re-review by experts and final review by chief editors".The responsible subject of each link faces certain ethical dilemmas,that is,the psychological alienation of the first-review editor to the manuscript and the author,the alienation of the re-review expert in the decision-making power,and the alienation of the final-review expert in politics and human nature.The causes of alienation are complex in terms of subject ethics and academic orientation,so we should strengthen editorial self-discipline and heteronomy to realize the standardization of journals.

academic journalsthree-review systemethical dilemma

赵春

展开 >

《常熟理工学院学报》编辑部,江苏 常熟 215500

学术期刊 三审制 伦理困境

全国高等学校文科学报研究会2021年度编辑学课题江苏省期刊协会2021年度期刊出版研究课题

PY20210562021JSQKB02

2024

黑河学院学报
黑河学院

黑河学院学报

影响因子:0.169
ISSN:1674-9499
年,卷(期):2024.15(7)