首页|声音保护"参照适用"的教义解释

声音保护"参照适用"的教义解释

扫码查看
《民法典》第一千零二十三条第二款首次对声音保护采用"参照适用"的准用性立法技术,但是存在操作路径不明确的问题.首先,对《民法典》第一千零二十三条第二款的调整范围展开教义解释,作为参照适用主体的"声音保护"中的"保护"指除"资格确认"外的全部事项,对"声音"应作"声音利益"之理解;作为参照适用客体的"有关规定"不受本章或本编范围之限制.其次,对声音保护可供参引的规范范围进行限缩,可构成触发"参照适用之例外"的"差异性"限于侵权形态差异和保护位阶差异.在涉及"差异性"的场合,宜以《民法典》第九百九十八条为依据实现声音侵权责任的认定,其余归入"相似性"的部分可援引肖像权保护的规定.
Doctrinal Interpretation of the"Reference Application"Rule for Voice Protection
The second paragraph of Article 1023 of the Civil Code adopts the quasi applicability legislative technique of"reference application"for the voice protection for the first time,but the operation path is not clear.Firstly,the doctrinal interpretation of the scope of adjustment of Article 1023(2)of the Civil Code should be carried out.As the subject of"reference application",the"protection"in"voice protection"refers to all matters except for"qualification confirmation",and the"voice"should be understood as"voice interests".As the object of"reference application",the"relevant provisions"shall not be limited by the scope of this chapter or this part.Secondly,the scope of provisions of voice protection that can be cited should be limited,and the"difference"that constitutes the trigger of the"exception of reference application"should be limited to the difference in infringement forms and protection levels.In the case involving"difference",Article 998 of the Civil Code should be used as the basis for the identification of voice tort liability,and the remaining part classified as"similarity"may invoke the provisions of the protection of portrait right.

reference applicationpersonality raitspersonality interestvoice

刘景琪

展开 >

武汉大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430072

参照适用 人格标识 人格利益 声音

2025

河南财经政法大学学报
河南财经政法大学

河南财经政法大学学报

影响因子:0.69
ISSN:2095-3275
年,卷(期):2025.40(1)