宏观经济研究2024,Issue(3) :51-60.

宏观审慎监管的历史变迁、国际经验与实践进路

杨雪斌 姜俊羽 王红梅
宏观经济研究2024,Issue(3) :51-60.

宏观审慎监管的历史变迁、国际经验与实践进路

杨雪斌 1姜俊羽 2王红梅3
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中央财经大学中国公共财政与政策研究院
  • 2. 武汉大学弘毅学堂
  • 3. 中央财经大学政府管理学院
  • 折叠

摘要

加强金融监管是中国当前金融工作的重点,宏观审慎监管作为中国金融监管体系的组成部分,其重要性在金融市场日益复杂的趋势下不断凸显.本文在阐述中国宏观审慎监管的历史变迁与现状的基础上,着重分析了当前宏观审慎监管面临的问题:系统性风险识别困难,监管工具和监管范围存在完善空间,外部治理机制有待加强.同时,本文有针对性地探讨了宏观审慎监管的国际实践经验,以为中国完善宏观审慎监管提供思路.基于此,中国应继续坚持"双支柱"的调控框架,合理确定不同规模银行适用的资本要求,积极拓展监管工具和监管范围,完善宏观审慎监管全流程治理机制,重视宏观审慎监管的国际互惠合作,从而牢牢守住"不发生系统性金融风险"的底线.

Abstract

Strengthening financial regulation is a focal point of China's current financial work.As a key part of China's financial regulatory sys-tem,the importance of macro-prudential regulation is increasingly prominent against the backdrop of an increasingly complex financial market.This paper elucidates the historical evolution and current situation of China's macro-prudential regulatory system construction,focusing on the challenges faced by macro-prudential regulation today:diffi-culties in identifying systemic risks,spaces for improvement in regulatory tools and scope,and the need for enhanced external governance mechanisms.Furthermore,this paper discusses international experiences in macro-prudential regulation,offering insights for the perfection of China's macro-pruden-tial regulatory system.Hence,China should adhere to a'dual-pillar'regulatory framework,setting reasonable capital requirements for banks of different sizes,and actively expanding regulatory tools and their scope.It is important to enhance the whole-process governance mechanism of macro-prudential regulation and place a high value on international reciprocal cooperation in this area,to firmly guard against systemic financial risks.

关键词

宏观审慎监管/金融监管/资本要求

Key words

Macro-prudential/Regulation Financial/Regulation/Capital Requirements

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
宏观经济研究
国家发展和改革委员会宏观经济研究院

宏观经济研究

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.739
ISSN:1008-2069
参考文献量26
段落导航相关论文