Identification and Response:An Examination of Ideological Risks in the Grouping of Network Circles
Based on the rapid development of new information technology,while pursuing individualized network life,humans are constantly constructing network communities with different styles and functions,forming a phenomenon of network circle grouping characterized by the complex coupling of individual grouping and group personalization.As a result of the combined effects of active and passive construction,the network circle group is constantly building new forms and prospects of public network collective life,and also constantly creating new carriers and spaces for various social interactions.The network circle group is conductive to the relationship aggregation,information exchange and emotional transmission of the whole society,bringing efficient and convenient communication mechanism to the public.However,its inherent characteristics such as closeness,homogeneity and exclusiveness also imply potential threats to induce negative social opinion and even ideological risks.The relevant risks are mainly manifested in various forms,such as the external shielding risk caused by the difficulty in accurately controlling ideological tendencies within the circle,the interactive separation risk caused by the deep integration of mainstream ideology,the risk of implicit dissemination caused by the difficulty in timely resolving negative ideological trends within the circle,and the risk of homogeneous resonance caused by the difficulty in effectively avoiding the polarization process of viewpoints within the circle.It is urgent to promote scientific guidance based on the laws of network circle group generation and evolution,coordinate the comprehensive governance functions of law,system and morality,and cooperate with the two-way empowerment of mainstream ideological identity and information technology development for implementing dialectical measures and actively dealing with the risks.
ideologynetwork ideologynetwork circle groupmainstream ideologydominant ideologyrisk examination