首页|生态环境标准"入法"反思——基于71例生态环境损害判例的实证分析

生态环境标准"入法"反思——基于71例生态环境损害判例的实证分析

扫码查看
在司法实践中,生态环境标准被纳入《中华人民共和国民法典》第一千二百三十四条、第一千二百三十五条之"国家规定",用于生态环境损害案件的审理,国家和地方生态环境标准均有适用,主要包括污染物排放标准和生态环境质量标准.在违反生态环境标准的同时,需要造成生态环境损害,才会被认定为违反"国家规定".生态环境标准对事实认定和法律适用产生多重影响,为深入理解这一现象,以卢曼的系统沟通理论为分析框架,基于71例生态环境损害判例,阐释由生态环境标准引起的各个系统间的互动过程,发挥法律系统相较于其他社会子系统"观察之观察"的优势.目前,生态环境标准"入法"存在生态环境标准适用的矛盾与空白导致生态环境损害赔偿不足或过度赔偿,欠缺环境公共利益与其他公共利益综合考量,过于依赖虚拟治理成本计算生态环境损害赔偿数额的问题.针对这些问题,提出以下建议:明确划定纳入"国家规定"之生态环境标准的边界及其划分标准,以确保标准的统一性和可操作性;通过完善程序和实体规则,在生态环境标准的司法适用中促进"事实"与价值的有机融合,平衡多种价值冲突;改进生态环境损害鉴定、评估及其司法适用的方法和流程,同时适时更新质量较高的生态环境标准及司法解释.
Reflection on the Incorporation of Ecological Environment Standards Into the Law:Empirical Analysis Based on 71 Cases of Ecological and Environmental Damage
In juridical practices,ecological environment standards are included in the"national regulations"in Articles 1234 and 1235 of the Civil Code and are used for the trial of ecological and environmental damage cases.Both national and local ecological environment standards are applicable,mainly including pollutant emission standards and ecological environment quality standards.Moreover,only those who cause ecological and environmental damage while violating ecological environment standards will be convicted of violating"national regulations".Ecological environment standards have multiple impacts on fact determination and legal application.In order to further understand this phenomenon,Luhmann's System Communication Theory was used as the analytical framework.Based on the empirical study of 71 cases of ecological and environmental damage,the interactive process between systems caused by ecological environment standards was explained,giving play to the"observation for observation"advantage of the legal system over other social sub-systems.At present,the inclusion of ecological environment standards in the Civil Code has such problems as insufficient or excessive compensation for ecological and environmental damage due to the contradictions and gaps in the application of ecological environment standards,the lack of comprehensive consideration of environmental public interests and other public interests,the excessive dependence on the virtual governance cost to calculate the amount of compensation for ecological and environmental damage.The following suggestions are proposed for these problems.Firstly,the boundary and division standards for the ecological environment standards to be included in"national regulations"should be clearly defined,so as to ensure the unification and operability of standards.Secondly,the organic integration of"fact"and value should be promoted in the judicial application of ecological environment standards by perfecting procedures and entity rules,in order to balance the conflicts among multiple values.Thirdly,the methods and procedures for the identification,evaluation and judicial application of ecological and environmental damage should be improved.In the meanwhile,high-quality ecological environment standards and judicial interpretations should be timely updated.

ecological environment standardecological and environmental damageCivil Codesystem theoryecological communicationsecond-order observation

周雪莹、李义松

展开 >

河海大学法学院,江苏南京 211100

河海大学环境资源法研究所,江苏南京 211100

生态环境标准 生态环境损害 民法典 系统论 生态沟通 二阶观察

中央高校基本科研业务费专项经费资助项目江苏省社会科学基金重点项目江苏省政府招标项目

B22020703319FXA002SJC2021F-11103

2024

河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
河海大学

河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.055
ISSN:1671-4970
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 33