首页|两种直升机多舱油箱惰化系统代偿损失比较

两种直升机多舱油箱惰化系统代偿损失比较

扫码查看
针对某型直升机多舱油箱,设计了冷却空气控温和燃油热沉控温的2种多舱油箱惰化系统.基于AMESim平台搭建了这2种系统模型,研究了这2种系统的控温效果和各舱油箱参数变化规律,并且引入代偿损失指标对这2种系统性能进行评估.仿真结果表明:2种惰化系统均能控制膜前温度维持在90℃;燃油热沉控温的多舱油箱惰化系统在整个飞行过程中,各舱油箱中最高燃油温度小于32℃,没有超过许用限制;对于直升机而言,由于油箱相比大型客机而言体积较小,通过计算可得,冷却空气控温的多舱油箱惰化系统的燃油代偿损失小于燃油热沉控温的多舱油箱惰化系统的燃油代偿损失.仿真结果为多舱油箱惰化系统的设计和优化提供了参考依据.
Comparison of Compensation Losses Between Two Types of Helicopter Multi-Bay Fuel Tank Inerting Systems
For a certain type of helicopter multi-bay fuel tank,a multi-bay fuel tank inerting system using cooling air to control temperature and a multi-bay fuel tank inerting system using fuel heat sink to control temperature are designed.The two models are built based on AMESim platform to study the temperature control effect of the two systems and the variation law of tank parameters of each bay,and the performance of the two systems is evaluated by introducing compen-satory loss index.The simulation results show that both inerting systems can maintain the bleed air temperature at 90℃.The maximum fuel temperature in each bay is less than 32℃and does not exceed the allowable limit during the whole flight.For helicopters,due to the smaller size of fuel tank compared with large passenger aircrafts,it can be calculated that the fuel compensation loss of the multi-bay fuel tank inerting system using cooling air to control temperature is less than that of the multi-bay fuel tank inerting system using fuel heat sink to control temperature.The results can be pro-vided as a reference for design and optimization of the multi-bay fuel tank inerting system.

hollow fiber membrane inertingmulti-bay fuel tankliquid cooling systemAMESim simulationfuel com-pensation loss

王俊杰、范菊莉、郭晨阳、刘宇萌、段伟杰、冯诗愚

展开 >

南京航空航天大学航空学院飞行器环境与生命保障工信部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210016

中航工业集团有限公司直升机设计研究所,天津 333001

中空纤维膜惰化 多舱油箱 液体冷却系统 AMESim仿真 燃油代偿损失

国家自然科学基金委员会-中国民用航空民航联合研究基金中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金江苏省高校优势学科建设工程

U1933121

2024

海军航空大学学报
海军航空工程学院科研部

海军航空大学学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.279
ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.39(2)
  • 18