首页|氢燃料电池重型车全生命周期节能减排效果评估

氢燃料电池重型车全生命周期节能减排效果评估

扫码查看
对比分析5种常用制氢途径的全生命周期能耗、温室气体与大气污染物排放量,并以此为基础,结合当前氢气供给结构与能源结构,核算中国氢燃料电池重型车(HHDV)全生命周期能耗、温室气体及大气污染物排放量,与柴油重型车(DHDV)进行对比,分析推广HHDV对节能减排的作用和效果.结果显示,电网电电解水制氢的能耗和温室气体排放均为最高;可再生能源电电解水制氢的CO2及CH4排放最低,甲烷催化重整制氢能耗及N2O排放最低;HHDV全生命周期能耗和温室气体排放分别为20.4 MJ/km、1 492.7 g/km,分别比DHDV高20.0%和41.5%,表明在当前氢气供给和能源结构条件下HHDV无法实现节能减碳效果;HHDV和DHDV的大气污染物排放各有优劣,与污染物的种类有关.
Evaluation of life cycle energy saving and emission reduction effects of hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty vehicles
The life cycle energy consumption,greenhouse gas(GHG)and atmospheric pollutant emissions of five commonly used hydrogen production pathways were analyzed and compared in this study.On the above basis,combined with the current hydrogen supply structure and energy structure,the life cycle energy consumption,atmospheric pollutant emissions,and GHG emissions of hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty vehicles(HHDV)in China were calculated.In addition,compared with those of diesel heavy-duty vehicles(DHDV),the effect of promoting HHDV to achieve energy saving and emission reduction was analyzed.The results showed that among five hydrogen production pathways,the total primary energy consumption and GHG emissions of grid electricity electrolysis were the highest,CO2 and CH4 emissions of renewable power electrolysis were the lowest,and the energy consumption and N2 O emission of methane catalytic reforming was the lowest.The life cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of HHDV were 20.4 MJ/km and 1 492.7 g/km,respectively,which were 20.0%and 41.5%higher than those of DHDV,respectively.It indicated that HHDV could not achieve emission reduction and energy saving effects currently.The atmospheric pollutant emissions of HHDV were not always higher or lower than those of DHDV,depending on the types of pollutants.

hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty vehicleslife cycle assessmentenergy consumptiongreenhouse gasatmospheric pollutant

于亚梅

展开 >

上海市环境监测中心,上海 200235

氢燃料电池重型车 全生命周期评价 能耗 温室气体 大气污染物

上海市生态环境局青年科研项目

沪环青科[2023]第8号

2024

环境污染与防治
浙江省环境保护科学设计研究院

环境污染与防治

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.79
ISSN:1001-3865
年,卷(期):2024.46(4)
  • 34