首页|碳减排约束下不同能源类型垃圾转运车适用性竞争力分析——以深圳市为例

碳减排约束下不同能源类型垃圾转运车适用性竞争力分析——以深圳市为例

扫码查看
以柴油、LNG、纯电动和氢能垃圾转运车为研究对象,从车辆的续航能力、全生命周期使用成本、碳排放水平、长期竞争力等不同维度对车辆的适用性进行综合对比研究。结果表明:纯电动转运车受限于续航里程短、充电时间长,在 8h连续工作时间内,其工作临界运距为 23。7 km;基于全生命周期使用成本和未来碳价上涨趋势,相比于LNG转运车,短运距(≤23。7 km)情景下氢能和纯电动转运车的竞争力时间点分别为 2030 年和2050 年;长运距(>23。7 km)情景下,氢能转运车竞争力时间点为 2035 年,但纯电动转运车长期不具备竞争优势;现阶段垃圾转运车清洁化替代方案宜采用"以气为主、电氢为辅"的策略,并以场景为导向构建差异化的综合能源补给设施。
Competitive Analysis of Suitability for Garbage Transfer Trucks with Different Energy Types Under Carbon Emission Reduction Constraints:A Case Study of Shenzhen City
Diesel,liquefied natural gas(LNG),pure electric and hydrogen-powered garbage transfer trucks were chosen as the research objects.The applicability of different trucks from different dimensions,such as vehicle endurance,total cost of ownership,carbon emission and long-term competitiveness were comprehensively studied.The results showed that pure electric transfer truck had a critical working distance of 23.7 km within 8 hours operation period,due to the short battery range and long charging time.Considering the total cost of ownership and future trend of carbon price increase,hydrogen-powered and pure electric transfer trucks would achieve competitive parity with LNG transfer trucks by 2030 and 2050 under short-distance(≤23.7 km)scenario.Under long-distance(>23.7 km)scenario,the competitive parity of hydrogen-powered transfer trucks would be 2035,but pure electric transfer trucks didn't have competitive advantage for a long time.At present,the clean alternative of garbage transfer truck should prefer a"gas-primary,electric and hydrogen secondary"approach.And differentiated comprehensive energy supply facilities should be built based on scenario.

domestic wastetransferenergy typecarbon emissioncompetitiveness

彭晓为、唐玉婷、钟日钢、余昭胜、林延、吴浩

展开 >

东莞职业技术学院智能汽车产教融合创新中心,广东 东莞 523000

华南理工大学电力学院,广东 广州 510640

惠州深能源丰达电力有限公司,广东 惠州 516000

中国科学院广州能源研究所,广东 广州 510640

深圳能源环保股份有限公司,广东 深圳 518000

展开 >

生活垃圾 转运 能源类型 碳排放 竞争力

国家重点研发计划东莞职业技术学院科研项目

2018YFC19029002023a06

2024

环境卫生工程
天津市市容环境工程设计研究所

环境卫生工程

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.279
ISSN:1005-8206
年,卷(期):2024.32(3)