首页|2018-2022年苏州市城区和县区大气PM2.5的污染特征和源解析及健康风险评估

2018-2022年苏州市城区和县区大气PM2.5的污染特征和源解析及健康风险评估

扫码查看
目的 了解苏州市城区和县区大气PM2.5中重金属和类金属离子、多环芳烃和水溶性离子的污染特征和来源解析,并评估PM2.5对人群的健康风险.方法 2018年1月至2022年12月每月10-16日采集苏州市城区和县区大气PM2.5样品,分别用称重法、离子色谱法和液相色谱法检测大气PM2.5及其主要成分的浓度,并利用PMF模型判断PM2.5的可能来源,采用EPA健康风险模型评估PM2.5对人群的健康风险.结果 2018-2022年苏州市城区和县区大气PM2.5的年均浓度分别为40.00 μg/m3和43.00 μg/m3,超标率分别为17.72%和17.89%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但县区大气PM2.5中重金属和类金属离子及多环芳烃浓度高于城区,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).苏州市城区大气PM2.5的主要来源为化石燃料燃烧源和交通排放源,县区的主要来源为化石燃料燃烧源和工业源.城区和县区大气PM2.5中重金属和类金属离子对人群产生的HQ值均小于1,非致癌风险较低;两区Cd、Pb和Ni对人群产生的致癌风险CR值均小于1×10-6,属于人群可以接受的风险水平,而As和多环芳烃的CR值均大于1×10-6,对人群有潜在的致癌风险.结论 本次调查的苏州市城区和县区存在大气PM2.5污染且主要污染来源不同,两区PM2.5中的As和多环芳烃对人群有潜在的致癌风险,应针对性地加强对As和多环芳烃主要污染来源的管控.
Pollution characteristics,source apportionment,and risk assessment of PM2.5 in urban district and county of Suzhou city from 2018 to 2022
Objective To understand the pollution characteristics and source of metal and metalloid,polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)and water-soluble inorganic ions(WSIIs)in PM2.5in urban district and county of Suzhou City,and to know the health risks of PM2.5 to the local residents.Methods Ambient PM2.5 samples in the investigatedurban district and county of Suzhou city were collected from 10th to 16th every month from January 2018 to December 2022.The concentrations of PM2.5 and thetoxic components were detected by weighing method,ion chromatography and liquid chromatography,respectively.The pollution sources of PM2.5 were determined by the PMF model.And the health risks of PM2.5 were assessed by the recommended USA EPA model.Results The annual concentrations of PM2.5 in urban district and county of Suzhou City from 2018 to 2022 were 40.00 μg/m3 and 43.00 μg/m3,respectively,and their exceedance rates were 17.72%and 17.89%,respectively(both P>0.05).However,the concentrations of metal and metalloid and PAHs in PM2.5 in county were higher than that in urban district(P<0.05).The main pollution sources of PM2.5 in urban district were fossil fuel combustion and traffic emission,and the main sources of PM2.5 in county were fossil fuel combustion and industrial emission.The HQ values of PM2.5-bound metal and metalloid in both urban district and county were all less than 1,with lower non-carcinogenic risk.The CR values of Cd,Pb and Ni were less than 1×10-6,which could be acceptable carcinogenic risk level for the local residents.However,the CR values of As and PAHs were greater than 1 ×10-6,with potential carcinogenic risk for the local residents.Conclusion Ambient PM2.5 pollution exists in urban and county areas of Suzhou City,but the main pollution source spectrum is different.Due to the potential carcinogenic risk for the local residents,the control measures of the main pollution sources of As and PAHs should be strengthened.

Particulate matterMetal and metalloidPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsSource apportionmentHealth risk assessment

周晓龙、王瑛、刘强、陆颂文、沈超、李杰、赵敏娴

展开 >

苏州市疾病预防控制中心环境卫生科,江苏苏州 215000

颗粒物 重金属和类金属 多环芳烃 源解析 健康风险评估

2024

环境与健康杂志
中华预防医学会,天津市疾病预防控制中心

环境与健康杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.658
ISSN:1001-5914
年,卷(期):2024.41(8)